5 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH3.2 costs - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Run costs
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
3.2 costs - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Run costs' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run costs' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
As for running costs - look for the best example you can find and it should cost relatively little.
3.2 costs - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T222516Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
9k to buy LHD
insurance depends, 800 for low risk, 1500 for medium risk
1500-2000 maximum per year to run
get an 87 one or later as these had the G50 gearbox
88s and 89s probably the sweetest as they improved the 3.2 every year it was made
clutch can be weak, oil leaks from engine barrels v common
good choice
I have an '89 targa and have had no probs with it whatsoever (bought it from portiacraft) its not concours but a good usable car with no leaks or problems that I can see but still under warranty so no worries, one thing I would say is that if I were buying again I would definately get a coupe rather than a targa, firstly they are rarer (someone told me a ratio of 70:30 targas to coupes) much quieter at speed and the targa tops can get a little shabby and cost a fortune to replace or refurb and most people, myself included rarely remove them in the UK. obviously coupes attract a price premium over targas also. one thing I would advise is (obvious really) go and look at as many cars as you possibly can and visit all the dealers to get an idea of good cars and shabby cars, if they are looked after they last incredibly well but if not can cost a kings ransom to put right but are still cheaper than 964's. I think the 3.2s are becoming more sought after at the moment due to there classic shape and relatively simple mechanicals and good ones are starting to appreciate in value (I hope!)also dont be put off by colour as most 3.2s in keeping with the fashion of the times were red black or white (very few metallic cars around) mine is guards red and looks great!
Oh yes try elephant.com for insurance as well they are not bad for my car, just drop the yearly mileage down to minimum and you will get a cheaper quote.
hope this of some help..
RobD
Just about to insure my SC for £197. Admitedly it's classic car insurance limited to 6000miles - but hey, you even get free europe wide breakdown cover!
As for running costs - look for the best example you can find and it should cost relatively little.
(I'm 32 by the way. Fully comp as a daily driver would have cost me about £700)
how much will a usable 3.2 carrea cost me
what about insurance and running costs
are they as dependable as they say
are there any horror parts to kook out for
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
