7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWhich Model ?
Leading reported evidence
Use turbo currently listed at the opc network
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
On every count (performance/reliability/depreciation/looks) - The 996 turbo Although there is only one used turbo currently listed at the OPC network under £40k, IMO you shouldn't limit yourself to OPCs.
Leading evidence: 'Use turbo currently listed at the opc network' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run cost' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Thanks guy's I think I had already discounted the turbo on running cost !
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I bet, whatever you lose on the extra running costs, you'll easily gain on lower depreciation and that's besides the performance difference.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
It will cost you more to run than a N/A car though.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
On every count (performance/reliability/depreciation/looks) - The 996 turbo Although there is only one used turbo currently listed at the OPC network under £40k, IMO you shouldn't limit yourself to OPCs.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T033922Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hannu, can't advise on which 996 unfortunately, however if it's any consolation that car you missed was not meant to be and there'll be a better one waiting for you I'm sure. A good start any way 911 and coupe ...... you could buy a cracking air cooled porka will your budget [
] Good luck with your search
OK I know this subject has been discussed before but here goes as help/advice is required.
Just sold my immaculate 2000my Boxster 3.2s with full history and only 29000 miles on the clock [
]
Anyway to cheer me up I'm now looking for my first and some (wife) may say only 911. Would like to buy from an OPC for warranty, finance and history comfort etc with a budget of 37k max.
Just miss what looked like my dream car, a Guards Red 996 2004my carrera 2wd with 32k on the clock, full history at £33k which had just been sold before I got the deposit together [
].
I definitely want a coupe and looking round it would appear that I have a choice of 2wd and 4wd S coupe between 2002 and 2004my.
I know its an age old story but torn between the wide bodied looks of the 4 S and the possible down side of weight and service cost. Or would I be better off with a good 2wd 996 or wait of a 997 to come up within budget ???????/ [
]
Problems Problems
There can
be
only one choice. On every count (performance/reliability/depreciation/looks) - The 996 turbo Although there is only one used turbo currently listed at the OPC network under £40k, IMO you shouldn't limit yourself to OPCs. Other specialists can offer better packages and a full Porsche Extended warranty (if bought before October 1st)
A C4S won't cost any more to service than a C2/C4. Although it is a bit heavier, it won't make a huge difference to performance. Rodney is correct, and 37K is definitely 2002 Turbo territory. It will cost you more to run than a N/A car though. You really need to drive them all, because they all have a different feel. The C2 is lighter and nimbler, the C4S is heavier and has a slightly more solid feel on the road, and the Turbo is electric. Don't rush, because there are plenty of cars on the market, and more appearing daily. Prices are continuing to slide as the market is getting saturated. You are in a strong position, so take advantage of it. Personally, I'd go for a reputable independent specialist rather than an OPC, but that's just my 2p's worth. Happy hunting!
Richard is right, definitely check out the Indie's - there are fantastic 996's around in every hue and model, take your time and choose well... good luck in the hunt.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
