12 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSprings and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Install 7mm front only spacers
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I fitted 7mm front only spacers to my 987 cars, and on my Spyder I had 28mm more front track, the cars are way way better like this.
Springs and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Install 7mm front only spacers' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust with smaller or larger spacers or removing them altogether' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
With regards to spacers, Porsche used 5 or 7mm spacers on the front of the Mk 1 996 GT3 (which utilised the same sized wheels) and the Boxster 550 Spyder 50th Anniversary edition also used 5mm spacers from and rear.
Springs and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
With regards to spacers, Porsche used 5 or 7mm spacers on the front of the Mk 1 996 GT3 (which utilised the same sized wheels) and the Boxster 550 Spyder 50th Anniversary edition also used 5mm spacers from and rear.
Springs and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Use 5mm spacers
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
With regards to spacers, Porsche used 5 or 7mm spacers on the front of the Mk 1 996 GT3 (which utilised the same sized wheels) and the Boxster 550 Spyder 50th Anniversary edition also used 5mm spacers from and rear.
Springs and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
With regards to spacers, Porsche used 5 or 7mm spacers on the front of the Mk 1 996 GT3 (which utilised the same sized wheels) and the Boxster 550 Spyder 50th Anniversary edition also used 5mm spacers from and rear.
Springs and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Adjust with smaller or larger spacers or removing them altogether
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
But if the OP doesn't like the changes then it's very easy to adjust with smaller or larger spacers or removing them altogether.
Springs and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Fill ” aesthetic, either fit wider wheels
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If you want the “wheel arch filled” aesthetic, either fit wider wheels with the correct ET numbers or use adjustable bottom arms (both coffin arms AND tuning forks) to gain a true wide track set up, doing the latter whilst retaining the OE wheels gives you the aesthetic whilst retaining the correct, factory negative scrub radius.
Springs and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Suggestion
If you want the “wheel arch filled” aesthetic, either fit wider wheels with the correct ET numbers or use adjustable bottom arms (both coffin arms AND tuning forks) to gain a true wide track set up, doing the latter whilst retaining the OE wheels gives you the aesthetic whilst retaining the correct, factory negative scrub radius.
Springs and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Fill ” aesthetic, either fit wider wheels
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If you want the “wheel arch filled” aesthetic, either fit wider wheels with the correct ET numbers or use adjustable bottom arms (both coffin arms AND tuning forks) to gain a true wide track set up, doing the latter whilst retaining the OE wheels gives you the aesthetic whilst retaining the correct, factory negative scrub radius.
Springs and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Suggestion
If you want the “wheel arch filled” aesthetic, either fit wider wheels with the correct ET numbers or use adjustable bottom arms (both coffin arms AND tuning forks) to gain a true wide track set up, doing the latter whilst retaining the OE wheels gives you the aesthetic whilst retaining the correct, factory negative scrub radius.
Springs and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Use 5 or 7mm spacers
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
With regards to spacers, Porsche used 5 or 7mm spacers on the front of the Mk 1 996 GT3 (which utilised the same sized wheels) and the Boxster 550 Spyder 50th Anniversary edition also used 5mm spacers from and rear.
Springs and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
With regards to spacers, Porsche used 5 or 7mm spacers on the front of the Mk 1 996 GT3 (which utilised the same sized wheels) and the Boxster 550 Spyder 50th Anniversary edition also used 5mm spacers from and rear.
Springs and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Use 5mm spacers
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
With regards to spacers, Porsche used 5 or 7mm spacers on the front of the Mk 1 996 GT3 (which utilised the same sized wheels) and the Boxster 550 Spyder 50th Anniversary edition also used 5mm spacers from and rear.
Springs and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
With regards to spacers, Porsche used 5 or 7mm spacers on the front of the Mk 1 996 GT3 (which utilised the same sized wheels) and the Boxster 550 Spyder 50th Anniversary edition also used 5mm spacers from and rear.
Springs and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Use adjustable bottom arms (both coffin arms and tuning forks)
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If you want the “wheel arch filled” aesthetic, either fit wider wheels with the correct ET numbers or use adjustable bottom arms (both coffin arms AND tuning forks) to gain a true wide track set up, doing the latter whilst retaining the OE wheels gives you the aesthetic whilst retaining the correct, factory negative scrub radius.
Springs and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Suggestion
If you want the “wheel arch filled” aesthetic, either fit wider wheels with the correct ET numbers or use adjustable bottom arms (both coffin arms AND tuning forks) to gain a true wide track set up, doing the latter whilst retaining the OE wheels gives you the aesthetic whilst retaining the correct, factory negative scrub radius.
Springs and spacers - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T061123Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Looking for some advice on springs and spacers. My 996.2 has been fitted with Bilstien B6’s, which I believe are designed to run the standard springs? Does anybody know if it’s possible to fit a set of lowering springs? I’d like to drop the car around 25mm
Any recommendations for wheels spaces? Would like to bring the wheels out ever so slightly. The cars fitted with sport design wheels, 8j 52 up front and 10j 65 out back.
car would under steer more with those spacers, I normally do the reverse and put wider in the front than the back.
Why ruin how it drives ? I would not fit spacers any way, the car looks nice and spacers will just give the whole car road rash in a big way. I would rather keep my paint.
Chris Stott said:
I defy anyone to notice a 16mm relative track decrease at the front on the road, everything else being equal.
quite a big change adding front track. Porsche do it model to model every newer car has more front track to get better turn in.
Why reverse this adding 15mm more rear track ? and add more push !
I fitted 7mm front only spacers to my 987 cars, and on my Spyder I had 28mm more front track, the cars are way way better like this.
The trend is for looks over driving 90% of the time and that is fine if you don't like driving and just after how it looks.
As always it's personal choice. I always go after how a car drives myself.
Even if it made a noticeable difference, there are loads of other variables that can be adjusted to compensate… or would simply need to be in optimal condition.
In any case, only Troy Queef can drive a car hard enough on the road to notice a 7mm spacer
Chris Stott said:
Even if it made a noticeable difference, there are loads of other variables that can be adjusted to compensate… or would simply need to be in optimal condition.
In any case, only Troy Queef can drive a car hard enough on the road to notice a 7mm spacer
This ^ 100%
Resto157 said:
Looking for some advice on springs and spacers. My 996.2 has been fitted with Bilstien B6’s, which I believe are designed to run the standard springs? Does anybody know if it’s possible to fit a set of lowering springs? I’d like to drop the car around 25mm
Any recommendations for wheels spaces? Would like to bring the wheels out ever so slightly. The cars fitted with sport design wheels, 8j 52 up front and 10j 65 out back.
As you’ve stated, the B6 are designed to run with standard springs at OE ride heights, ergo dropping the ride height 25mm will be sub-optimal.
Neither the front or rear suspension have excess amounts of bump or rebound travel, so removing 25mm from the equation will compromise matters.
Have a chat with Ben at String Theory or Chris at Center Gravity for real some real world advice.
With regards to spacers, Porsche used 5 or 7mm spacers on the front of the Mk 1 996 GT3 (which utilised the same sized wheels) and the Boxster 550 Spyder 50th Anniversary edition also used 5mm spacers from and rear.
Fitting 15mm spacers to the front of a car not designed for them will alter the negative scrub radius :
https://www.carthrottle.com/news/what-scrub-radius...
Edit to add this video :
If you’re a driving god, you’ll just ignore this stuff and bolt on wider spacers anyway (because you know best) the reality is a 5-7mm front spacer is fine, but a 15mm spacer is less than ideal.
If you want the “wheel arch filled” aesthetic, either fit wider wheels with the correct ET numbers or use adjustable bottom arms (both coffin arms AND tuning forks) to gain a true wide track set up, doing the latter whilst retaining the OE wheels gives you the aesthetic whilst retaining the correct, factory negative scrub radius.
Here’s my car on stock wheels, Ohlins R&T along with adjustable coffin and caster arms.
No spacers front or rear.
Edited by Slippydiff on Thursday 20th March 12:10
Chris Stott said:
Even if it made a noticeable difference, there are loads of other variables that can be adjusted to compensate… or would simply need to be in optimal condition.
In any case, only Troy Queef can drive a car hard enough on the road to notice a 7mm spacer
You like golf i see,
If I gave you 2 drivers, I bet you could tell the difference in each one, I on the other hand would have no clue what so ever.
I would not be telling you "you cannot tell one driver from another" £10 or £500 I would have no clue which was which.
GT_cars said:
You like golf i see,
If I gave you 2 drivers, I bet you could tell the difference in each one, I on the other hand would have no clue what so ever.
I would not be telling you "you cannot tell one driver from another" £10 or £500 I would have no clue which was which.
Yes, I like golf, but I don't think I'm Rory McIlroy
I've also probably done more road miles in 996's than anyone other than maybe PPBB.
Slippydiff said:
Resto157 said:
Looking for some advice on springs and spacers. My 996.2 has been fitted with Bilstien B6’s, which I believe are designed to run the standard springs? Does anybody know if it’s possible to fit a set of lowering springs? I’d like to drop the car around 25mm
Any recommendations for wheels spaces? Would like to bring the wheels out ever so slightly. The cars fitted with sport design wheels, 8j 52 up front and 10j 65 out back.
As you’ve stated, the B6 are designed to run with standard springs at OE ride heights, ergo dropping the ride height 25mm will be sub-optimal.
Neither the front or rear suspension have excess amounts of bump or rebound travel, so removing 25mm from the equation will compromise matters.
Have a chat with Ben at String Theory or Chris at Center Gravity for real some real world advice.
With regards to spacers, Porsche used 5 or 7mm spacers on the front of the Mk 1 996 GT3 (which utilised the same sized wheels) and the Boxster 550 Spyder 50th Anniversary edition also used 5mm spacers from and rear.
Fitting 15mm spacers to the front of a car not designed for them will alter the negative scrub radius :
https://www.carthrottle.com/news/what-scrub-radius...
Edit to add this video :
If you’re a driving god, you’ll just ignore this stuff and bolt on wider spacers anyway (because you know best) the reality is a 5-7mm front spacer is fine, but a 15mm spacer is less than ideal.
If you want the “wheel arch filled” aesthetic, either fit wider wheels with the correct ET numbers or use adjustable bottom arms (both coffin arms AND tuning forks) to gain a true wide track set up, doing the latter whilst retaining the OE wheels gives you the aesthetic whilst retaining the correct, factory negative scrub radius.
Here’s my car on stock wheels, Ohlins R&T along with adjustable coffin and caster arms.
No spacers front or rear.
Edited by Slippydiff on Thursday 20th March 12:10
Is that your living room?
GT_cars said:
car would under steer more with those spacers, I normally do the reverse and put wider in the front than the back.
Why ruin how it drives ? I would not fit spacers any way, the car looks nice and spacers will just give the whole car road rash in a big way. I would rather keep my paint.
Or it gives more stability at the rear when trail braking.
It won't ruin how it drives. But if the OP doesn't like the changes then it's very easy to adjust with smaller or larger spacers or removing them altogether.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.