5 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAll In Autos in Norco, California
Leading reported evidence
Replace story
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
They claimed to have no knowledge of a car I was interested in as it "just came from auction"--but as I was taking the car away for a PPI, a lower-level employee offhandedly said I would love the car since they just "pulled the head"--already changing story.
Leading evidence: 'Replace story' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace story' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Replace story
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
They claimed to have no knowledge of a car I was interested in as it "just came from auction"--but as I was taking the car away for a PPI, a lower-level employee offhandedly said I would love the car since they just "pulled the head"--already changing story.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Pelican Parts: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T213932Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Greetings,
I am looking for a RWD 996 Coupe. It does not have to be trophy wife grade, as I am to use it for track days primarily. This place seems to have several of them. Does anyone have experience with them, sales or otherwise?
If I found one I like I would need a PPI. Since I am in the Midwest a referral for that service would be very helpful.
http://www.allinautos.com/inventory
Thanks,
Jason
P.S. Besides the IMS and RMS issues are there any other things I need to zero in on before making a 996 my tool of choice for HPDE stuff?
Hi Jason - try posting in our
Classifieds
section; you'll likely get a lot more eyes on the 996 there. Also, if you're looking for someone in a specific state/area, post in our
Regional Forums
- make sure to include the city/state in the title of the thread. Best of luck and post some pictures when you get one!
Have a great Thanksgiving!
-Dmitry
I had recent experience with these guys, and I would steer clear unless you know what you are doing. They claimed to have no knowledge of a car I was interested in as it "just came from auction"--but as I was taking the car away for a PPI, a lower-level employee offhandedly said I would love the car since they just "pulled the head"--already changing story. Red flag one! I then noticed the oil pressure was pegged but there was no warning light. Red flag two. I took the car to a local mechanic for a PPI and he immediately noted that the throw out bearing was shot and that the car would need all new brakes and a clutch--fine I knew that was possible. But when we got the car on the rack, sure enough they had done some work on the heads, and there were the common leaks at the engine-transmission, and we couldn't even get the deck lid open. Seemed like someone just did enough work to get it running--It was obviously a no-go for me, and the mechanic only charged me for a half hour--even he said to pass on the car. Personally, I would rather get a car with no history than one someone had tinkered with just enough to sell. I just couldn't trust them.
As I say, they are a real buyer beware type of place. The cars look much better in their photos than real life. You might get a good deal if you don't mind buying someone else's patched up problem.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
