fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

New BMW Z4M

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
11 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHNew BMW Z4M

Leading reported evidence

Use cwt

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Dang - saw the CW and thougth Cwt - and tried doing some math to figure how you could come up with 0.37 as still use Cwt and then, in mild desparation, went to the BMW site - I'm going to go get another glass of wine now

New BMW Z4M
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use cwt' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use cwt' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 11 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use cwt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Dang - saw the CW and thougth Cwt - and tried doing some math to figure how you could come up with 0.37 as still use Cwt and then, in mild desparation, went to the BMW site - I'm going to go get another glass of wine now

New BMW Z4M
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T103553Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 2Original post

.37cw is that the same as cd? (coefficient of drag) ? 3,267 pounds or 300lbs heavier than the Cayman S, 10lb/HP = 30HP penalty all else being equal. Sad that the interior isn't sharper too... I thought the old Z3 M's had a great interior...

POST 3Original post

All information here : http://www.bmw.com/com/en/index_highend.html Clik on 'All the facts' section

POST 4Original post

Dang - saw the CW and thougth Cwt - and tried doing some math to figure how you could come up with 0.37 as still use Cwt and then, in mild desparation, went to the BMW site - I'm going to go get another glass of wine now

POST 6Original post

Actually the Z4 handles better much better than the z3. With the stiffness of a coupe, it should do well in the handling department. However, I can't stand how the car looks, and I don't think it has much road feel. At least the z4s I drove did not. Perfromance numbers and specs are not everything. This is really sad as I was once nuts about my M5. Now BMWs are not even on my radar screen. CP

POST 7Original post

Certain to me a good performer, but ugly!/fckeditor/editor/images/smiley/MWPX/thumbs_down.gif

POST 8Original post

With some of the newer cars surfacing today Porsche may need to re-think its present plan of slow and marginal horsepower increases over time. Looks like it may be time for an injection shot across the board. While I don't think this new MZ4 will be a cross-shopping competitor to the Cayman.......it most certainly will be for the Boxster.......andin later coupe form will give the Cayman buyers something else to look at. If I was the boss at PorscheI would drop the 2.7L in the Boxster making the 280HP S engine standard, with the3.4Cayman S engine the new Boxster S engine. The base Cayman engine should be the 3.4 with the 3.6 from the Carrera as the 'S' engine. The 911 would start with the 3.8 as standard with the 3.8 w/X51 package as the S. Now that's a cool lineup IMO.

POST 9Original post

I think the official pictures of the Z4M in Imola Red just look superb, but for GBP43k base price you are only GBP1k away from the Cayman S. Whilst the performance may be similar, I know which one I would rather own.

POST 10Original post

Despite the horsepower gap (which is nothing new), I don't believe that Porsche loses customers to BMW. BMW does lose customers to Porsche. A little research on the internet sites will reveal that many posters have previously urged Porsche to 'wake up to the competition' with little effect on Porsche's marketing philosophy. Most significantly, Porsche has not lost any sales by refusing to take up the HP challenge. I drove the Z4 3.0 when it was first introduced (my 986 lease was soon to expire) and while I was impressed by the engine, the rest of the car's performance was just ho-hum, and I could not warm up to the look of the car. I've owned several BMWs but the new Bangle generation just doesn't do anything for me, they are either ugly, dull, or both. The technology is overdone, an example of doing something just because it can be done. I just hope this doesn't represent the end of a great marque.

POST 11Original post

Atlas Croc's recommendation is right on target. Competition is a good thing, and I hope it gives Porsche a little incentive to quit being so stingy with HP.I love the way my 987 drives, but amtired of avoiding baldguys in Jags who want to drag race. Am not sure a C7S is enough, maybe I should just get a 997S ora Z06. The 1485 KG has 75 KG added for the driver / luggage and I interpret the DIN EU1 to also mean it has a 90% tank of gas. Considering those items, it is probably very close in weightto the Cayman. Edited by - John Ferguson on 10/26/2005 5:37:22 PM

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.