3 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNo US Listing for Porsche
Leading reported evidence
Run scared"
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Run scared"' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run scared"' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T161109Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
A majority of the Ordinary shares are held by the familly and relatives. The Frankfurt / US listing was to my understanding in relation to the Preference shares that are more widely held by investors.
I have to side with the good Doctor here - why pay tens of thousands of pounds to accountants just to conform with exchange listing regulations designed for multinationals. Porsche is still thankfully a small to medium size car company. In the majority owned by the family still - reporting twice a year is fine.
>> Edited by Leithen on Friday 23 August 12:28
"Porsche Running Scared"
"What's WW so afraid of?"
Dr. Wendelin Wiedeking took the decision to opt out of the Frankfurt MDAX top 70 index when they introduced the obligatory quarterly accounts rule. He felt that quarterly accounts would give a distorted picture of the business due to its cyclical nature - development costs, tooling, outsoutced parts and even sales vary from season to season.
The article you used as a basis for your posting failed to mention that under German law no CEO can take sole responsibility for a company's financial accounts. The responsibility must be shared by the entire Board of Directors and, as the good Doctor said, no-one can attest the absolute accuracy of figures provided by accountancy staff.
Mistakes take time to filter through, and provision is always made for these in company accounts. We are talking about minor mistakes here - far removed from the fraudulent activities of the US concerns which have recently made headlines. And it is no surprise that an ethically sound Board of Directors should take offence at the implications inherent in the new US ruling, just as they would be offended by your own insinuations.
Porsche remains under family control.
The US regs are simply designed to make CEOs accountable for their accounts.
What's WW so afraid of?
BTW: Who owns Porsche these days? Is it still mostly members of the VW dynasty? How independent are they?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
