fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

What''s a 3.6 M96 in need of a re-build worth?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
5 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHWhat''s a 3.6 M96 in need of a re-build worth?

Leading reported evidence

Run but tapping away, had a quick poke

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

It's running but tapping away, had a quick poke with the bore scope and couldn't see much but still that's the most likely fault, tends to smoke from the passenger tailpipe which suggests it's the usual right hand bank bore score issue.

What''s a 3.6 M96 in need of a re-build worth?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run but tapping away, had a quick poke' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run but tapping away, had a quick poke' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run but tapping away, had a quick poke

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

It's running but tapping away, had a quick poke with the bore scope and couldn't see much but still that's the most likely fault, tends to smoke from the passenger tailpipe which suggests it's the usual right hand bank bore score issue.

What''s a 3.6 M96 in need of a re-build worth?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

As the title really, just wondering what people think I should ask for the M96 that I'm removing from my 996 project is worth. It's running but tapping away, had a quick poke with the bore scope and couldn't see much but still that's the most likely fault, tends to smoke from the passenger tailpipe which suggests it's the usual right hand bank bore score issue. The buyer can have pretty much as much of it as they like, tip gearbox, ECU, wiring etc. I'll hang on to the exhaust and cats though. Starting to need to fund parts for my MA101 swap........ 😂

POST 2Original post

Well, there is another on here being sold at the mo for £3k, I think with bore damage. They are certainly in demand, from people whos engines and cranks have been damaged beyond economic repair.

POST 3Original post

Yes it is mine. No6 is cracked so a Hartech 3 cylinder replacement is required to be on the safe side.

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Well I'd be happy with 3k, for that they can have all the ancillaries and the gearbox too. Gets me some of the way towards an ECU for my project.

POST 5Original post

Always interested in buying engines - subject to condition of course. Contact Grant on [email removed] if any available. Baz

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.