fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

appreciating asset

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHappreciating asset

Leading reported evidence

Replace a stripped down, air cooled track eating machine

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

964 RS on the other hand hasnt been replaced - a stripped down, air cooled track eating machine.

appreciating asset
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace a stripped down, air cooled track eating machine' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'wrong place' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace a stripped down, air cooled track eating machine' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 8 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

wrong place

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause · Original poster

I know this is probably the wrong place to post being the 996 forum but I have a question that may give some interesting replies.

appreciating asset
Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace a stripped down, air cooled track eating machine

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

964 RS on the other hand hasnt been replaced - a stripped down, air cooled track eating machine.

appreciating asset
Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

wrong place

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause · Original poster

I know this is probably the wrong place to post being the 996 forum but I have a question that may give some interesting replies.

appreciating asset
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T083035Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I know this is probably the wrong place to post being the 996 forum but I have a question that may give some interesting replies. If you were lucky enough to have £50k to spend on a great drivers cars, preferably a Porsche, and you hoped it would at least stay steady or even gain a little in value over the years, where would your money go?

POST 2Original post

In no particular order: 964RS 993TT 996GT2/3/3RS Three generations, all sought after and fantastic driving tools. C.

POST 3Original post

To be very honest and checking the market carefully , if I want something solid , I would go for two assests only : 964 RS 993 TT The 996's were made in such high numbers to be considered solid - heck no car around 50k ( at least in the Porsche "modern" worl ) could be seen as an investment - they will all loose money with time, some faster some slower. Those two will , within your price band, loose money much slower than anything else. I would recommend a 993TT - fast, furious and its the last of aircooled turbo's. Personally, I bought a 996TT - I want an everyday supercar and the 993 to live everyday its a bit complicated - although if I wanted something for the weekends I would probably went to the 964RS. A 996 GT2 is the worse option of all - along with the 996TT, their values are going down down down... GT3 is going down but at a much slower rate. The reason of the GT2/GT3/GT3RS to go much faster down on depreciation is easy - they are being replaced. Yes the GT2 is a fantastic machine. But theres a new model that its better. And will be another, etc. 964 RS on the other hand hasnt been replaced - a stripped down, air cooled track eating machine. Same with the 993TT - its the last of the aircooled beasts ( if you dont count with the uber rare 993GT2 ) and that will make him a classic. Plus build quality is top notch and mint examples are getting harder to source. That was my advice, do your homework and see what you would like

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

it's not "my" £50k, it's virtual. my dosh went in a 996 turbo already. Just interested in the views of others.

POST 5Original post

i think some cars are overpriced atm (shown by the number of people cashing in) IMO 993GT2, 993RS, 1973RS, 964RS are all over priced so i wouldn't feel so secure buying one. 993TT i like mine it seems to float around the same price and for the money you get allot of bang for your buck. 996's seem to have been to widely produced but perhaps the GT3 MK1 might find a market or the ex race cars (often go up in price over time after the initial dip in price)

POST 6Original post

From personal experince: Model (Year): Purchase Price (mileage) - Trade in price on p/x (mileage) 993C2 (1996): £22,000 (74,000) - £18,000 (89,000) 993Targa (1996) £28,000 (56,000) - £22,000 (64,000) 993TT (1998): £44,000 (54,000) - £35,000 (70,000) 996TT (2000): £44,000 (44,000) - £34,000 (56,000) Following car owned for 3 weeks so probably doesn't count 996TT (2002): £46,000 (46,000) - £44,000 (47,000) Saw a lot of appreciation but it wasn't my wallet :lol:

POST 7 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

3 weeks! what happenef there then? you could have rented one for less.

POST 8Original post

I reckon an unmolested low miles RHD GT3 mk 1... rare, and good value compared to other 'RSs' which are all premium money- I agree with Simon- the market's frothy In the current climate though, who knows. Any big ticket item is vulnerable. Alternatively, a really sorted, original low miles 3.2 ClubSport Or even a nice 3.2 Carrera Sport coupe, and you'd have lots of change. Its a classic, so its done its depreciating...

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.