10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPorsche Warranty Nightmare
Leading reported evidence
Run car without oil and therefore it blew up
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No doubt the owner claimed that the OPC ran the car without oil and therefore it blew up.
Leading evidence: 'Run car without oil and therefore it blew up' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run car without oil and therefore it blew up' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I haven't followed this story, but I'm intreagued how a 996 can be run without oil in it when, every time you turn the ignition on, it shows the oil level on the dash ??
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I haven't followed this story, but I'm intreagued how a 996 can be run without oil in it when, every time you turn the ignition on, it shows the oil level on the dash ??
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T225432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
[&o] On the theme of Porsche Warranties - Have any of you folk been following the the rebuild project in the Total Porsche Mag. this is where Mark Dunsford has purchased a 996 very cheaply? and is restoring it to it's former glory, but for me the real story concerns the OPC who appear to be the villan of the piece and ably assisted by Porsche GB.
Mark does not say where the dealer is situated for fear of some litigation, but I think he owes it to all Porsche owners to let us know where the alleged despicable service is offered, so that we can give the OPC a wide berth - any ideas from anyone in the know?
Yes, I'm following that, too.
It does make clear that there was litigation between the former owner and the OPC. No doubt the owner claimed that the OPC ran the car without oil and therefore it blew up. Presumably the OPC claimed that some other form of abuse by the owner had weakened the engine, that they ran it as they found it, and it blew up.
Unless there was a judgement in the litigation, I can't see that we can ever be in a position to distinguish between the two. In which case, it would be a little unfair to expose the OPC. I
think
I recognise some of the fencing in the compound, although it is fairly generic OPC style, but I'm not saying where I think it is.
Hi Michael
One of the reasons that I have a particular interest is that a similar incident happened to me when I had an Audi with the 5 cylinder engine, I had it serviced regularly by an Audi/VW Independant and they were always conscientous, however after about a week of my wife driving it around town I took it on a 90 mile round trip and near the end of this trip I was cruising the motor way at about 95 mph, it was 01.00 hrs! when there was an almighty bang and I came to a standstill on the hard shoulder, on opening the bonnet there was a red throbbing mass where a conrod had smashed through the crankcase, when the AA arrived and we were surveying the damage we both noted the absence of any oil in the engine bay or on the road and the dipstick showed that the sump was empty, we concluded that the oil had never been put in at the service, the car had previously been treated with "Slick"oil additive, by a previous owner and they claim that an engine can be run for a period without oil, anyway the garage accepted liabilty and obtained a "short" engine and swopped over the head etc. I am under the impression that this 996 engine was run without oil in it and if the failure happened shortly after a service then I would expect a better response from any garage, it would be interesting to know what the other side of the argument is and also why the dealer did not take better care of the stored parts.
I haven't followed this story, but I'm intreagued how a 996 can be run without oil in it when, every time you turn the ignition on, it shows the oil level on the dash ??
I am following the story in Total 911, quiet interesting
If someone without much care was about to road test the car i bet they just started the car without even looking at the oil level on the dash.
Phil
If you just get in and turn the key, then the oil level check is cancelled.
I'm guessing that the OPC didn't look after the parts because they were subject to the litigation. Experts reports were mentioned in the article, so it would have been important for the OPC to be able to say that they didn't meddle with anything, but just left it entirely untouched.
Shame about the exterior condition, though.
If they were keeping the parts as evidence how come there were parts in the box which did not even belong to this car? also if required for evidence then they should have been kept in a locked crate in a secure area, I think that the state into which the bodywork was let deteriorate is indicative of the appalling attitude of this OPC, which is why I would like them to come forward and defend their actions and then I could judge if they are a company I would entrust with my car.[>:]
I've read the article and I'd love to know which dealer this is as they've treated this customer, his car and the parts in a very shabby and negligent way. For example, The car was covered in dents from where doors (of other customers' cars presumably) had been bashed into it; if that's symbolic of the respect with which they treat customers' "pride and joy" then they deserve to go out of business.
It has a grey warehouse-type building next to the compound with a yellow stripe on it if that narrows it down, and is somewhere south of Cirencester...