8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCAT D Advice - To Sell
Leading reported evidence
Use some very posh toilets at porsche main agents
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I have used some very posh toilets at Porsche main agents.
Leading evidence: 'Use some very posh toilets at porsche main agents' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Repair against' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Now whether it is a c/d/s/ etc is down to the cost of repair against using mfg origional parts and labour costs.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
They send out a loss adjuster and sometimes they agree to replace an entire kitchen because there is one damaged unit, then on another occasion, they will try to get away with just changing one cabinet.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Now whether it is a c/d/s/ etc is down to the cost of repair against using mfg origional parts and labour costs.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
They send out a loss adjuster and sometimes they agree to replace an entire kitchen because there is one damaged unit, then on another occasion, they will try to get away with just changing one cabinet.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi Everyone,
I'm looking for your opinions on a guide price for a 1998 Porsche 911.
It's a manual and has done 112,000 miles, in artic silver with a PSM exhaust.
Has service history and had an engine rebuild in 2009 at 65,000 miles.
Have paperwork and pictures showing CAT D in 2008 with the rear bumper damaged.
Few little marks around the front and rear bumper but overall a very nice car.
Would welcome your opinions please everyone 😀
It's generally accepted that the value of a Cat car is 66% -75% of an otherwise identical straight car.
fyi a 10 year old 996 would have been worth sub £20k trade in 2008 so the damage need not have been significant for it to have been written off.
This cat c/d/s thing is really misleading.
The catagory is an invention of the
insurance
companies.
In the old days a write off was a car that had been smashed to pieces with chassis damage and other horrible things.
Now whether it is a c/d/s/ etc is down to the cost of repair against using mfg origional parts and labour costs. Labour costs are determined by overheads not skill. I have used some very posh toilets at Porsche main agents.
So is the car nice, well looked after, all swage lines correct, drives in a straight line?
If so, and you like it , buy it or walk away.
My own car was a cat s because of a dent in the rtear qtr which cost £160 to beat out by a skilled crafts man, it did not need £6.5k of a new qtr panel plus fitting at £180 per hour!
I rest my case.
Not very sure how they work out their categories at all, I think
insurance
companies really lack consistency, this is the same with household claims.
Our company carry out property insurance repairs for several insurers, this can be fire, flood, subsidence etc. Id do the surveys and work out the costs.
They send out a loss adjuster and sometimes they agree to replace an entire kitchen because there is one damaged unit, then on another occasion, they will try to get away with just changing one cabinet. basically - same/similar damage but different loss adjuster.
I had a 996 cab that was my first 911, after one year of ownership, a car pulled out in front of me and damaged the wing, door, bumper, rad, wheel and bonnet.
Insurers tried to send me to a place this did ambulance repairs, you couldn't make it up.
Anyway, i made a lot of fuss and they then sent me to Bodytechnics in Slough, who do really high end repairs, they worked out an estimate and the job came to over 18K. this was more than i had paid for the car, plus insurers agreed to a full set of refurbed wheels, (Chris Excel did these).
The car was not worth more than 15K at the time plus I had been provided a nice BMW cab for several weeks, whilst all this was going on. All part of the claim.
There was never any mention of writing the car off or Cat D Cat C or anything. So it's all a nonsense, I think it just depends who gets the job on their desk and makes the decision.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.