24 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNew Vehicle Tax Refund Rules
Leading reported evidence
Replace their mind
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Needless to say I'm off to the Post Office tomorrow first thing, before they change their mind!
Leading evidence: 'Replace their mind' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace their mind' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If you see the following link I think they changed there minds again on the prices!
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
It'll be a big decision to do it as I definitely won't be able to use the car if she's SORN.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
24 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T173940Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
For those of us with a March '01 to March '06 car who may have been thinking of a refund and re-tax before next March's hike have a read of this
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring/OwningAVehicle/HowToTaxYourVehicle/DG_172479
Does it mean if you don't take the car off the road (SORN) for at least 21 days then no refund is paid? Think I'll do mine in December to make sure.
If you see the following link I think they changed there minds again on the prices!
£400 only applies to cars registered after 23/03/06
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring/OwningAVehicle/HowToTaxYourVehicle/DG_10012524
Looks like it...
I got my Tax Disc renewal form through today, and for my 2004 (Dec 1st) C4S, at 277g/km, it's asking me to pay £210 for the year...
Needless to say I'm off to the Post Office tomorrow first thing, before they change their mind!
I was expecting £400...
Good times!
Got my renewal today £400, bloody hell thats a lot of money, will not be long before the road tax is more than the insurance [
]
Does anyone know where I can get the tax disc holder that says paid the road tax, how about fixing some effing pot holes !
I think I have it right ... to summarise, for 996 owners ...
a) For those pre-Y reg (i.e. pre 1/3/2001) cars: Stays on non CO2 based system = 185 GBP currently
b) For those with 1/3/01 to 22/3/06 cars: Currently 210, will become 440 for renewals with start of April 2009 +
c) For those with 23/03/06 onwards cars: Currently 400, will become 440 for renewals with start of April 2009 +.
And, just to discourage those in category (b) from cancelling and renewing just before the increase, our lovely government have introduced a new law that only allows you to get a refund if its SORN'd for 21+ days, before renewal which takes effect from 1st Jan 2009.
I think that it will come in next April '09 - but they'll probably do something like make it apply to just the new cars sold from that date onwards which (let's be honest here) would make it a fair green tax. If they do it this way it will encourage the manufactures to put some work in on lowering emissions and increasing MPG. Look what Porsche have just done with their new 997...?! More power, more MPG, less emissions!! What ever is going to happen next...? A black guy running America.....? Dooh! ...Or a 23 year old British black guy winning the F1 World Championship....? Double dooh!!![
]
You know if we all did what the government wanted and drove round in poxy little euro/diesel boxes and paid £35 a year tax they would sharp panic as there would be no cash in their car tax piggy bank [&:]
As Adrian says it should only be on vehicles registered from next April onwards (if at all) I hope someone sees sense before then [
] where will it all stop.............!!
Really - do you know something we don't - I hope you're right, but we talking of just 4 and a bit month's time !
As for the other hopefuls ... we can all dream - there was a back bench revolt back last July when 49 labour MPs objecte to these retrospective increases, but the government defeated them.
While we're on the subject guys, I've just had my renewal notice for the end of November (£210 for 12 months) and was just contemplating taking her off the road until early next year. Does anyone know how straight forward it is to re-activate the tax when you want to? In other words I would declare the car SORN until about next Feb and then renew it before the new rules come in in April. (But I do have my doubts about whether they will or not..?)
It'll be a big decision to do it as I definitely won't be able to use the car if she's SORN. Anyone ever done this (and regretted/not regretted it?)
Adrian.
I don't see the point of doing that in all honsety. Assuming the new changes kick in and you SORN in December and re-tax in March, then you'll only be gaining from being able to extend your cheaper rate for 2 months .. i.e. (440-210)*2/12 which is about 40 quid gain.
just 4 and a bit month's time !
a lot can happen in that time martin-
but i was commenting on those whose tax may not be due till 9-10 months time-by which time the govt may well be changed.
I SORN my 911sc every year around Sept/Oct and then tax it again around March/April without a problem. Its easy to re tax it, just go on line or to the post office, no hassle as long as all the docs, mot, ins etc are in order [
]
...ehh...? Surely, if I don't tax my car at the end of November and take it off the road and then re-tax it next March (when the prices will be the same as now), I'll be gaining as I'll get a years tax (March '09 to March '10) at the current rate - instead of taxing her now and having to do it again in November '09? Or am I missing something here....?
Thanks to Mercurial for this link:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/3429019/Labour-U-turn-on-car-tax-rises.html
It seems like it might not be necessary to SORN your post-March 01 car (yet).
Things are looking up [
] well for the time being anyway. I've just had a look on the governments site here
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring/OwningAVehicle/HowToTaxYourVehicle/DG_10012524
there were details of the new tax hikes all over this page the other day, now they appear to have been removed!!
My hunch is that if it has been binned for now, that will become permanent. As the government seems now to be consistently behind in the polls, it means they will want to hang on until the last before they call a general election, which means it will be in the spring of 2010. The last thing they will want is a guaranteed vote loser to materialise six months before.
My 996 is a Jan 2001 car anyway so it looks like I'm partially immune.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.