fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

Is this "disc" part of the rear top mount?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHIs this "disc" part of the rear top mount?

Leading reported evidence

Use on top of the new top-mount (hopefully underneath!!)

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Am surprised to see this rusty 'disc" - is it part of the top-mount or will it just have been re-used on top of the new top-mount (hopefully underneath!!)

Original post Read captured discussion
Is this "disc" part of the rear top mount?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use on top of the new top-mount (hopefully underneath!!)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use on top of the new top-mount (hopefully underneath!!)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use on top of the new top-mount (hopefully underneath!!)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Am surprised to see this rusty 'disc" - is it part of the top-mount or will it just have been re-used on top of the new top-mount (hopefully underneath!!)

Original post Read captured discussion
Is this "disc" part of the rear top mount?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T150451Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi, have just had some KW V3's fitted and as part of the job I paid for new top-mounts all round. Am surprised to see this rusty 'disc" - is it part of the top-mount or will it just have been re-used on top of the new top-mount (hopefully underneath!!) Thanks!

POST 2Original post

No picture so at a guess your talking about the front shocks and the rusty bit would be the old bearing carrier or the cover . This isn't part of the top mounts so will have been reused i expect .

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks and sorry, photo now attached. As per title it's the rear shocks....

POST 5Original post

Someone on here (Alex or MC I think?) did a post marvelling at how expensive these are. A lick of paint would have sorted that out!

POST 7Original post

Aghhh i see now .. normal to reuse these and nothing to worry about .

POST 8Original post

They should have given it a lick of black paint .

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks all, agree they could've given them a quick paint, but they're out of sight so no real harm done. Was just checking that they weren't the old top-mounts...!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.