2 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHRadar detectors
Leading reported evidence
Use laser
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Most hand held cameras (I believe) use a laser which only needs to lock on you you for a few moments and then your caught.
Leading evidence: 'Use laser' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use laser' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
As these dont pick up radar waves, it will NOT detect temporary or hand-held guns but WILL detect other camers that use sensors in the road or average speed cameras that the other one wont.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
As these dont pick up radar waves, it will NOT detect temporary or hand-held guns but WILL detect other camers that use sensors in the road or average speed cameras that the other one wont.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
2 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T200546Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I've always found that when reading reviews (real life) about Radar detectors the devices always seem to be hit and miss. In some cases you see the camera before the radar does - not good.
It has however been a while since I've looked into them and would appreciate peoples latest views on the technology and options out there.
Hi Mike,
I have had a few of the 'older / original' radar detectors that sense the actual radar thats emitted from the camera and have found them to be lame at best. Often not picking them up (obviously, the camera may not have been active at the time) or not until you are literally on top of them.
The problem with them is that the cameras usually face the same direction you are travelling, so the radar waves are not directed to oncoming traffic. The radar dector is front facing and relies on the dector picking up 'scatter' - being some of the radar waves that are bounced in your direction from the surrounding area or from other vehicles. If its a clear and open road then there are no objects to bounce the radar waves in your direction and wont be picked up.
Also, they are highly prone to false alarms from this like radio interference and sometimes automated doors on shops but I believe the better (or, more expensive) filter many of these out.
I am not sure but I thought they were being made illegal in the UK at some point.
The other, and I believe a far more popular choice is the GPS type of radar dector such as Snooper etc. This works in a very different manner. The police / government / council or whoever register the GPS co-ordinates of all fixed cameras and allow companies such as Snooper access to these locations (no doubt for a hefty £££). All these locations are updated into the Radar Dector which has an in-built GPS receiver and alerts you when you are travelling towards a location and doesnt rely on picking up radar waves. You will have to update you dector via your PC regularly to get the latest locations and most suppliers of dectors will charge you annually for this service.
As these dont pick up radar waves, it will NOT detect temporary or hand-held guns but WILL detect other camers that use sensors in the road or average speed cameras that the other one wont.
Most hand held cameras (I believe) use a laser which only needs to lock on you you for a few moments and then your caught. My snooper has a laser detector built in in over 3 years hasnt picked up a signal once. The only way it would help is from the very limited 'scatter' effect of a lasr being point at another vehicle and somehow the detector picking op some of these stray waves.
So, I guess in an ideal world you would have a laser, radar and GPS device built in.
And then there are also electronic devices that jam a laser signal which is something different.
My personal experiences with radar detectors that pick up radar waves has been very poor, however, my Snooper (S3 I think) that uses a GPS is excellent and has without a doubt slowed me down at the right points and saved me points...
Hope that helps,
Rob
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.