13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHVehicle excise duty
Leading reported evidence
Replace tax disc
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Replace however i think the chancellor is taking the opportunity
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
That's really good news for a a change, however I think the chancellor is taking the opportunity to get rid of a very unpopular tax increase (and a very unfair one that lacks evidenced justification) in a hope of looking the good guy.
Leading evidence: 'Replace tax disc' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace however i think the chancellor is taking the opportunity' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Replace however i think the chancellor is taking the opportunity
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
That's really good news for a a change, however I think the chancellor is taking the opportunity to get rid of a very unpopular tax increase (and a very unfair one that lacks evidenced justification) in a hope of looking the good guy.
Use environmentally based excuses can be forgotten
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Also shows how their justification for increases using environmentally based excuses can be forgotten when it suits!!!
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Replace however i think the chancellor is taking the opportunity
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
That's really good news for a a change, however I think the chancellor is taking the opportunity to get rid of a very unpopular tax increase (and a very unfair one that lacks evidenced justification) in a hope of looking the good guy.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T225432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
So .. they backtacked (hooray!). Quote ... "
cars that emit over 225 g/km, but were registered between 1 March 2001 and
23 March 2006, will be moved into the new band K in 2009 and stay there in
2010
. This will mean that they maintain their exemption from the top rate of
VED."
i.e. post 2001 996's will be just
£215 in 2009-10 and £245 in 2010-11
I thought that's what I caught on the news, I acme straight onto the site as I was sure someone would have picked up on it!
That's really good news for a a change, however I think the chancellor is taking the opportunity to get rid of a very unpopular tax increase (and a very unfair one that lacks evidenced justification) in a hope of looking the good guy.
Not so good news for those who have been shopping for a pre '01 911 though!
Well that is good news.
Out of curiosity I've just looked at the DVLA website and after doing a quick calculation in 2010 there will be something like 41 potential tax brackets, just for cars.
Mmm, streamlined!
this is true older 996's I will expect will rise in value a slight amount..
like back in 1992 when cat's where fitted if you had a K reg no one wanted it... J and your ok.
Here they are:
http://shop.ebay.co.uk/items/_W0QQ_dmptZUKQ5fCarsPartsQ5fVehiclesQ5fCarPartsQ5fSM?_nkw=paid+my+tax&_sacat=0&_fromfsb=&_trksid=m270.l1313&_odkw=yes+i%27ve+paid+my&_osacat=0
I went for the toned-down one.....
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
