21 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 3.4 C2, am I mad?
Leading reported evidence
Repair guarantee you get
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I guess that because it was a repair that was done FoC, the normal paintwork repair guarantee you get with an approved bodyshop wouldn't apply.
Leading evidence: 'Repair guarantee you get' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Repair guarantee you get' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Replace its not too expensive and you can forget about
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I have a 99 3.4 C2, i use it every day and I love it, you have to be prepared to look after it and it will cost you a little to own, but nothing outrageous, if you are worried about the IMS have the bearing changed, I did mine and my wife's Boxster, if you tie it in with a clutch change its not too expensive and you can forget about that hassle.
Replace its not too expensive and you can forget about
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I have a 99 3.4 C2, i use it every day and I love it, you have to be prepared to look after it and it will cost you a little to own, but nothing outrageous, if you are worried about the IMS have the bearing changed, I did mine and my wife's Boxster, if you tie it in with a clutch change its not too expensive and you can forget about that hassle.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
21 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 1 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T140027Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
For a while now I've been trying to get my first 911 which was supposed to be a 964/3.2 carrera. The problem is I just can't seem to get one which is remotely appealing. Armed with a £14/15K budget I thought I was in the right ball park to getting a good usable car but having travelled the country and looked at so many so called "immaculate" cars I've really given up on the idea.
So I've started to look at the 996 as an option. Given my budget a good 3.6cc appears to be out with my range so I've been looking into trying to get a 3.4 with a m030 pack and a LSD, although I'm rather confused with reference to the LSD option as I always thought the M220 was a LSD but I've been told it's a 40% locking diff whatever that means?
Anyway, I've singled out a 1998 3.4 with 62K on the clock with every invoice and previous MOT that has at least the m030 and a locking diff? replacement clutch at 53K and NO oil leaks for £12K.
I'm I staring at a heart breaking proposition or are the horror storries more of an internet warrior crusade than the reality of owning such a car, and is £12K to steep?
Thoughts and advise very much appreciated.
Never settle for second best[&:]
Nothing against the 996 but if you have your heart set on a 3.2 every time you get in the 996 to drive you will say to yourself.
If Only................................
Wait - one will turn up[
]
I was in the same position as you and decided to go for the later model. I have just picked up a 996 3.6 C2 with 62k, sat nav, sun roof, fsh, new tyres, no leaks, carbon pack for your budget and really happy with the car and the drive. If you find the right car and haggle you will get a 3.6[
]
Where are you? If you like the look of mine I may be able to come to you as I do travel about the uk for work reasons from time to time. I don't usually use the 996 for this, but it would be fun to take it on a trip.
But, I'm off to St Tropez tomorrow for a week, so realistically I can't do anything for about the next 10 days.
But certainly a 3.6 lt 996 is within your budget.
I have a 99 3.4 C2, i use it every day and I love it, you have to be prepared to look after it and it will cost you a little to own, but nothing outrageous, if you are worried about the IMS have the bearing changed, I did mine and my wife's Boxster, if you tie it in with a clutch change its not too expensive and you can forget about that hassle.
They are great cars and you will smile every single day and look back at it when you park it
Go for it!
Well I just bit the bullet and committed to buy the 996 3.4. I must say the lsd and m030 pack make quite a difference over the standard cars I've tried. The car needs a little tlc cosmetically but there are no clunks or bangs to be heard and no mayo in oil filler so here goes.
Just hope I'm not on here in a few weeks time with engine disaster tales!
Richard - I didn't get your email, so have hosted the W103 Engine Lid Corrosion Recall information on the club server. You can download it from here:
https://www.porscheclubgb.com/legacy/clientftp/Register/996/misc/w103_996_rear_lid_corrosion.pdf
It might be useful for anyone else who has the problem. This is a US Technical Bulletin, but it was a UK recall also.
Unfortunately not a chance of getting the lid fixed. The service action was carried out 8 years ago so that's it. Was quite interested to hear from the dealer that they've see a few like it, another thing to look out for before making a purchase.
On another note, I've been poking about in the front bulk head and to my horror after clearing the leaves I've found a very rusty battery tray.[
] Anyone else had this issue? I was going to attempt to remove the tray and get a direct replacement but I'm concerned about damaging the captive studs. Advise much appreciated.
Are they saying it WAS done on your car? If not then I'd have thought a recall would still be valid now. On 993s certainly some recalls are still available (and free) if somehow the car was missed at the time.
No I didn't talk to reading. I was told that because the recall work had been carried out 8 years ago Porsche no longer carry any obligation especially since the car is outside the anti corrosion warranty. Swiftly followed by "when can I book your car in for a service sir".
I guess that because it was a repair that was done FoC, the normal paintwork repair guarantee you get with an approved bodyshop wouldn't apply. Presumably it has reappeared since the original 10 year warranty ran out.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.