911uk

Beware - Stay Clear of this 996 C4S. "sevice history st

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

2 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHBeware - Stay Clear of this 996 C4S. "sevice history st

Leading reported evidence

Check with camtune they did some minor work

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
also checked with camtune they did some minor work but never serviced it
Original post Read captured discussion
Beware - Stay Clear of this 996 C4S. "sevice history st

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check with camtune they did some minor work' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check with camtune they did some minor work' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 2 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check with camtune they did some minor work

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
also checked with camtune they did some minor work but never serviced it
Original post Read captured discussion
Beware - Stay Clear of this 996 C4S. "sevice history st

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

2 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T203514Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

This was around when I was doing my car search around summer last year. The car seemed to pop back again with the same pictures. The car at the time it was listed was for sale I think for sub 20's and looks like its now up for £34k. The service history is apparently stolen - Like the rest of the car no doubt. http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/561331.htm The original thread was posted here. Will link if I find the thread.

POST 2 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Previous link- http://www.911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=31384&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight= --Post Snippet (mark pearce an approved trader here shed some light on the car)-- PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 5:33 pm i phoned and made some inquiries cars an import, 1st owner in aldershot the sellers the second owner its had a 111 point check at opc hatfield they coded a key or something minor for the first owner in aldershot the cars never been serviced by opc reading guildford chiswick, or hatfield also checked with camtune they did some minor work but never serviced it gave up after that --end--

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.