fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

Running costs of c4s or turbo

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHRunning costs of c4s or turbo

Leading reported evidence

Run by far

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The Porker is the cheapest to run by far.

Original post Read captured discussion
Running costs of c4s or turbo
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run by far' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run by far' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 11 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Run into cost

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Dave is the Man to run into cost on a TT..

Original post Read captured discussion
Running costs of c4s or turbo
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run by far

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The Porker is the cheapest to run by far.

Original post Read captured discussion
Running costs of c4s or turbo

Run into cost

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Dave is the Man to run into cost on a TT..

Original post Read captured discussion
Running costs of c4s or turbo
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi im currently looking for one of the above. I currently own an evolution 8 fq360 and was wondering what the running costs are compared to my evo i.e petrol tax insurance . thanks john

POST 3Original post

Turbo servicing costs are much more than the 4S

POST 5Original post

Dave is the Man to run into cost on a TT.. :welcome:

POST 6Original post

Judging from the people who have come from Evos & Scoobies, most have said petrol and insurance costs have been lower for the non Turbo 996 cars. Perhaps they are at a par with the Turbo cars then? ~ Maxie

POST 7Original post

I came from an M3 CSL to a C4S and the running costs are lower believe it or not I'm not to keen on the styling of the Turbo, those side vents and spoiler just dont do it for me, otherwise I would have gone for it. C4S is a VERY capable car, you will love it :bandit:

POST 8Original post

That's praise indeed from a previous CSL owner!

POST 9Original post

Before my 02 Targa, I had an XKR and then an M3. The Porker is the cheapest to run by far. I travel 3 miles to work each day, and am getting 22mpg. On a run at 80, Ill see around 32mpg. Go for it! :lol:

POST 10 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

i am, im currently looking just dont know, if i should go for a better car on balloon finance or a cheper car on standard finance.

POST 11Original post

I get about 26-7mpg in my X50 Turbo, which isn't bad at all! I don't drive like a lunatic, but then I don't drive sedately either!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.