12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH[HELP] Buying a 996 - Is this sound normal?
Leading reported evidence
Use ones r available
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use ones r available' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Inspect other usual items, as well' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Be sure to inspect all the other usual items, as well.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Can anyone help me understand if I should run away from this one or is it ~normal or potentially a cheap fix?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T163944Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi all,
Looking to buy my first 996 (and first Porsche!). I got these videos from the dealer and the car is making a very weird sound for my untrained layman years.
Can anyone help me understand if I should run away from this one or is it ~normal or potentially a cheap fix?
Many thanks!!
No, it's definitely not normal. I won't hazard a guess at the source of the noise, but I'm sure someone else can.
The positive terminal for jumping the car is missing it's cover and someone covered it with a red plastic cap.
If its only for about a minute on cold start up its the sai (secondary air injection) pump.
When the bearings go they get noisy. They r an emissions part that doesnt effect anything except diluting the exhaust at start up.
They r expensive units new but the bearings can be greased and i think there is a cheap merc or vw part that can be used. Also resonable used ones r available.
All that being said u should spend the money and get a 3rd party ppi (pre-purchase inspecrion)
I listened to both. Doesn't sound too bad but there is a whine. Given how dirty the engine compartment is, it might be one of the pulleys or the alternator. I take it this is not coming from a Porsche dealer, right?
Is that during a cold start, with the noise coming from the air pump on the left of the engine compartment, if so it should stop after a minute of the cold start..........
-Eric
Thanks all for all the help so far, I really appreciate it!
@De Jeeper
&
@Eric Kessel
I'll ask the dealer if the sound stops after a while. Thanks for that insight!
@DBJoe996
correct, not coming from a Porsche dealer.
@plpete84
I hope it's not the case, but will ask!
Your best safeguard is to get a pre-purchase inspection (PPI). Ask (here) for advice for a good independent shop near you that knows Porsches. There isn�t a lot that is a cheap fix if you�re taking any Porsche in for repairs.
I'm not saying don't get a PPI, but I also wouldn't expect it to find everything. I'll say this on repeat until people realize these aren't definitive. The one on my 911SC missed $6k+ of VERY obvious work needed, the one on my 996 missed $3k+ of similarly obvious work - all done by reputable shops. I've seen the same thing in other inspection work. If they screw up, you get the bill, so it is worth making sure you cover all your concerns directly before committing and this is something I'd get to the bottom of regardless of what a PPI says. Be sure to inspect all the other usual items, as well.
Thanks for all the help so far! Update: It sort of has a higher pitched noise consistently. Doesn't get lower or higher. No smoke on cold start. I asked if we can get someone to check it out. Will keep you posted!
If the pitch is constant and does not change with engine RPM that almost certainly sounds like the SAI pump to me. Very easy to access/replace and frankly not an important component at all. Literally just an electric fan to blow air into the exhaust for about 30 seconds on cold starts to warm up the catalytic converter a bit faster. If the engine is allowed to idle for several minutes does the sound disappear?
Thank you all for the help! I ended up passing on the car as the noise wasn't diagnosed and was told told by the dealer that it went through 2 PPIs and the interested parties didn't go through with the purchase (not sure why he'd share this with me, but glad he did).
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.