12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGallery Pics
Leading reported evidence
Check url does actually work
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
But its important to check the URL does actually work before you use it - obviously it only takes one character wrong or missing and the embed will fail.
Leading evidence: 'Check url does actually work' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check url does actually work' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Call the club office with your membership number and forum name, and they will change your status.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check url does actually work
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
But its important to check the URL does actually work before you use it - obviously it only takes one character wrong or missing and the embed will fail.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T213932Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Sorry Michael, Gallery pictures on the main PCGB site are for club members only. If you are a club member you need to get your forum status changed, and you will then be able to access the Technical Articles and FAQ sections of the 996 forum, and other areas. Call the club office with your membership number and forum name, and they will change your status.
I have wondered about the photos on the gallery and having tried to insert a photo on a few occassions, I have given up.
I followed all of the instructions and the photo was the correct size, but although my settings say that it should include a embedded photo, one never shows up.
Can someone magic me my photo too please?
Thanks.
Dillon
You do mean the main club web site, not the forum, don't you? If so, only the 996 Register Secretary can do that. Or me, as I have the administrator login details for the 996 pages of the main site. Let me have a photo and I'll add it to the gallery for you.
So long as I paste a
full URL
to an image that's already on the web (for me, that's Picasa web) the image embedding seems to behave itself. But its important to check the URL does actually work before you use it - obviously it only takes one character wrong or missing and the embed will fail.
I'm trying to get the club web site gallery enlarged, as it only allows 12 images on the page. If I'm successful, I'll email you.
Meantime, I've started another gallery on the forum for members and non-members to post their own pictures:
http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/fb.asp?m=428572
and I have closed this thread.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
