fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

Correct pressure for 996 turbo

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHCorrect pressure for 996 turbo

Leading reported evidence

Check boost if it is already correct though

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Saves me a bill from OPC asking them to check the boost if it is already correct though!

Correct pressure for 996 turbo
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check boost if it is already correct though' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check boost if it is already correct though' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 11 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check boost if it is already correct though

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Saves me a bill from OPC asking them to check the boost if it is already correct though!

Correct pressure for 996 turbo
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi all As above really - I am getting no more than 0.6 bar most of the time with my car, since the OPC carried out some repairs. I do occasionally see 0.7 bar, but mostly, it peaks through the gears at 0.6. Is this correct? Or is the car underboosting as I suspect? Thanks all JJ

POST 2Original post

i think 0.8 is the max for a std car, and thats MAX......so you wouldn't see it that often. does it feel slow? if you didn't have a gauge you wouldn't worry about it.

POST 3Original post

0.6 with the odd 0.7 is bang on for a standard turbo.

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

No turbo feels slow, but the boost being achieved appears lower than prior to some rectification works, but it is difficult to tell for sure. The problem is that the previous fault related to the car overboosting (achieving 1.2bar then backing off!). Prior to this fault, the car would peak and hold between 0.7 and 0.8 bar, which to my mind is the correct level for the car. I take your point about the gauge, but unless the gauges are known for being unreliable, I would have expected the car to achieve a minimum of 0.7 in most conditions. Thanks for input :mrgreen: Regards JJ

POST 5Original post

Is yours standard or an x50? 0.7/0.8 sounds more like the x50.

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi Dave Mine is the standard car. From what you say, the car is as it should be then. Good to know - just doesnt feel quite as nippy as she did prior to overboosting fault. JJ

POST 7Original post

James, I have a 2001 standards tt and I get 0.6 max, spikes to 0.7 and if I believe correctly I think I saw 0.8 one or two times. but from what you telling me sounds pretty much like mine. Hope it helps

POST 8Original post

James if you want more poke then get it remapped. On the turbo cars it makes a hell of a difference. Mine is now boosting to 1.0/1.1 although the gauge did show 1.4 this lunchtime momentarily when I came off the gas.

POST 11 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks for all the input guys - good to know that it is correct. I have considered getting her remapped, but I wanted to be sure that she was correct before going any further. Saves me a bill from OPC asking them to check the boost if it is already correct though! Forums at ther finest :mrgreen: :thumbs: JJ

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.