fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

996 Production Numbers: Slicing and dicing

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
32 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH996 Production Numbers: Slicing and dicing

Reported or suspected cause

1999 and maybe the porsche data

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

I think its probably a 1999 and maybe the Porsche data on their back end server is just misrepresenting it as a 1998.

996 Production Numbers: Slicing and dicing
Frequently discussed work

Fill orders

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The dip in 2000 came from many 2000 models being produced early, and then being sold as 1999 models to fill orders for first year cars.

996 Production Numbers: Slicing and dicing
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: '1999 and maybe the porsche data' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is '1999 and maybe the porsche data' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Fill orders' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 32 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 3 other evidence results

Fill orders

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The dip in 2000 came from many 2000 models being produced early, and then being sold as 1999 models to fill orders for first year cars.

996 Production Numbers: Slicing and dicing

Run of 1999 models started so early

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Since the production run of 1999 models started so early, that may account for the lower number of 2000 models.

996 Production Numbers: Slicing and dicing

Use data

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I wanted to get more insight to the 996 production, using the data that is commonly around.

996 Production Numbers: Slicing and dicing
Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Fill orders

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The dip in 2000 came from many 2000 models being produced early, and then being sold as 1999 models to fill orders for first year cars.

996 Production Numbers: Slicing and dicing

Run of 1999 models started so early

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Since the production run of 1999 models started so early, that may account for the lower number of 2000 models.

996 Production Numbers: Slicing and dicing

Use data

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I wanted to get more insight to the 996 production, using the data that is commonly around.

996 Production Numbers: Slicing and dicing
Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

1999 and maybe the porsche data

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

I think its probably a 1999 and maybe the Porsche data on their back end server is just misrepresenting it as a 1998.

996 Production Numbers: Slicing and dicing
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

32 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T075545Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I wanted to get more insight to the 996 production, using the data that is commonly around. There are sometimes discussions or questions about the future values, and the numbers will play a role. Here is what I see: Note: Coupe = Total - Cabs - Targas Not shown: Mk1 = 85,556. Mk2 = 89,608 (about equal) Note: C4 = (All 4s) - C4S The Excel sheet is attached for those who would like to dig in. The header row simply keys off of the row name (Mod�le) so other totals can quickly be created. A few of my observations ('cause it will hopefully cause the intended result: discussion). - The ME and AE are likely good long term investments. - Those two models and the C4S will stick out as "special" and always have a higher value. The Targa will probably not; those will be kinda like the early 911 Sportomatic. - Of course Turbos will always be highly desirable, but a lot were produced so they will hardly be considered rare. - Because of the very large number produced, on almost all of them, the condition of the car will be a much higher factor compared to rarity. So keep yours in excellent condition at all times. - I wonder what caused the dip in 2000? - I don't have the exact data, but believe I've read that for a first few years more Cabs were sold in the US than Coupes. - If I were investing for the long term, my choice would be the GT3. I searched a bit, but could not find any data about the US export quantities. If you know of a source, please let me know.

POST 4Original post

2000 - fire at the existing production plant, or something like that. Ask Jake.

POST 5Original post

There is some interesting data in the "earliest cars" thread. I think the numbers you have in the bar chart are for model year. Apparently, the 14 1997 models were pre-production cars. The 1998s were built beginning in early fall (around October) 1997 and registered in Europe, most of them as 1998s through calendar year 1998. The rollout of the 1999 models in the US was in April 1998. My car was built in March 1998, titled in May 1998 in South Carolina as a 1999 model year. Since the production run of 1999 models started so early, that may account for the lower number of 2000 models. Dot Com bubble could have had something to do with it. The 2005 models would be the Turbo and C4S built in late 2004/early 2005. Please correct me if I am wrong. Also, Europe kept proportionally more coupes than the US, resulting in cabs being a little more common over here than the coupes.

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 14196971

Good point, the previous chart treated C2 as "the rest". Here is an update, calculated as C2 = Total - (all the other categories). But there is where the slicing and dicing comes in, what is the definition of "C2", since perhaps the ME and AE are also labelled C2 ... or not?

POST 7Original post

Quotes source post: 14196971

I added the totals and got 175,164 996s produced. 87,734 varieties including the millennium and 40av, but excluding the C2. This leaves 87,430 "regular" C2s.

POST 8Original post

Good analysis. I hope most of us here are not 'collectors' and are actually out enjoying this fine automobile.

POST 9Original post

I understood targa's were comparatively rare...and these stats seem to confirm. I don't necessarily expect that to translate into future collect-ability...especially not mine as I drive to enjoy it.

POST 10Original post

Splitting Atoms: This is the info normally accepted for MY2005 production: 728 4S Coupe 763 4S Cabs 201 Carrera Cab 276 GT3 122 Turbo 18 GT2 129 Targa 90 GT3 Cup 127 Turbo Cab 598 Turbo S 960 Turbo S Cab

POST 12Original post

any *'s regarding the X51 cars, other than 40thAE ? I remember seeing it being as about 1% of all production

POST 13Original post

The dip in 2000 came from many 2000 models being produced early, and then being sold as 1999 models to fill orders for first year cars.

POST 14Original post

Quotes source post: 14198405

The data shows the cars platform not specific options so that data won't be as easy to find or compare by year.

POST 15Original post

here are some numbers. Not in a fancy chart though. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...ntQ/edit#gid=0

POST 16Original post

Are these figures all production, or only US sales?

POST 17 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 14210672

Yes, it is worldwide production. Haven't seen the US export totals, but if anybody has a lead on where to find those numbers that would be good.

POST 18Original post

Don't know if this is accurate or not, but: http://www.goodcarbadcar.net/2011/01...s-figures.html

POST 20Original post

Hello, I have a 2004 4S 996 Cabriolet w/ a manual six speed. Does anyone know how many of these were built? I was told this is somewhat of a rare car, but I just like driving it and I have no idea if it's unique. Thank you-

POST 21Original post

Question: is it possible to have a USA spec 1998 996? Im working on a car's window sticker and trying to solve this riddle. The owner registered it with the My Porsche portal and the report from there indicates its indeed a 996310 car (C2 Cabriolet) and for model year 1998. It also lists what you'd describe as the proper paint/interior codes and engine type/size. The VIN is North American and PCNA said it was sold by a USA dealer which I have. But here's the whammy: its registered as a 1999 car in the domicile state and CarFax says its a 1999. It had a salvage title issued in 2000 -- I think this is what's causing much of the confusion in all of this. The car looks and appears as a 1999 -- I dont think you could even convert a 993 to a 996 could you (weren't they apples and oranges)? The option code sticker was half torn under the hood but it has the 996310 and proper VIN. This is a real mystery. Never run into this before. I think its probably a 1999 and maybe the Porsche data on their back end server is just misrepresenting it as a 1998. I thought no 1998s were sold in the USA. Any insight?

POST 22Original post

Quotes source post: 17687465

Yes and no. in 1998, you could purchase a MY 1999 996. I can only think that in the US market, PCNA did not want to confuse customers buy having both a MY 1998 993 and a MY1998 996, so they just designated all 996s to be MY1999. I have a 02/98 build 996 that was delivered to the first buyer 04/98. It is a MY 1999 per the documentation.

POST 23Original post

Quotes source post: 17688198

That's what Im thinking too. I have never seen a 1998 996 Monroney and was never aware of 1998 model year cross pollenation of 993s and 996s like in 1989 when you could still get G-series 911s and the new 964. I also saw this thread that talked about this same conundrum: https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...in-1998-a.html I just dont know why in Porsche's database they are considering it a model year 1998 car. It has a June 1998 production date. If your February car was deemed a MY1999, then this one has to follow suit as well.

POST 24Original post

My 3/98 build 996 showed in my Porsche dealer's system as a 1998. FWIW.

POST 25Original post

There are thousands of 1998 996's outside of the US. I have one. The 996 was sold in the US as a MY99 even though you could get them in Europe as a MY98. Mine has a build date of 12/97.

POST 26Original post

Hi, just finding this thread. Bought a 2003 996 turbo last week. Interested in this--and going deeper. Did anyone find US stats (earlier than the one posted)? Going even deeper, has any one seen stats by exterior color or even exterior/interior color combo. OK, I know I'm going over the top :-) Thanks!

POST 27Original post

Not often talked about but there are approximately the same number of 996 Turbo Manual Coupes as there are 996 GT's (which are all Manual Coupes) worldwide ('bout 7,500 ea.). So before you sell the farm for a GT, remember the standard 996 Turbo Manual Coupe is just as rare as the 996 GT's, and still a relative bargain.

POST 28Original post

The 996.2 facelift numbers in this workbook only lists cars for 2002 onwards, however some 996.2 cars were definitely produced & sold in 2001. It would be interesting to know how many

POST 29Original post

All 2001 996 Turbos are 996.2 cars, so there's at least those cars.

POST 30Original post

Nevermind, after chatting with a friend & mulling it over I think we've figured it out. We've concluded the numbers listed as 2002, are for model year 2002 (as listed on the vin) which runs from July 2001- June 2002, so this would include all of the 996.2 cars built in calendar year 2001, with roughly 520 C2's built per month OR roughly 3124 during calendar year 2001.

POST 31Original post

Ex Pat here living in the USA, the difference here with all new cars is, you can obtain next years car this year. so people buy and take delivery on their new car for say 2023, as early as mid 2022. that has been the case for a long time, ANDDDD when you look at the build plate on the car it will say a production date of the month/year previous to its "Model Year" My wife ordered her BMW Z4 in August of 2021 and its a 2022 model year, when you trade these cars in or sell them they are listed as the model year not the production year. this does vary by manufacturer some release the build allotment as early as April the previous year, so you can have two cars both model year 2002 one made in 2001 and the other made in 2002.

POST 32Original post

@911Syncro , thanks for the thread. Always good to slice and dice the production numbers.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.