Planet-9

PCM 2.1 speed

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

6 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHPCM 2.1 speed

Leading reported evidence

Use female voice (default)

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I use a female voice (default).
Original post Read captured discussion
PCM 2.1 speed

Frequently discussed work

Set somewhere

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
Am I perhaps missing a setting somewhere?
Original post Read captured discussion
PCM 2.1 speed

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use female voice (default)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Set somewhere' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 6 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Set somewhere

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
Am I perhaps missing a setting somewhere?
Original post Read captured discussion
PCM 2.1 speed

Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Set somewhere

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
Am I perhaps missing a setting somewhere?
Original post Read captured discussion
PCM 2.1 speed

Use female voice (default)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I use a female voice (default).
Original post Read captured discussion
PCM 2.1 speed

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T191851Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

I have the PCM and would like to know from fellow PCM owners if they also feel that the system speed is a bit slow. I have a BMW nav system on my 2004 X5 and it seems quicker. Am I perhaps missing a setting somewhere? I would dearly appreciate if thread does not descend into TomTom/Navman etc is better than the PCM.

POST 2Original post

I have PCM 2.1 in my Cayenne S and I have actually been pretty surprised at the speed of the system; both in calculating the route and re-calculating an alternate route if you deviate from the original route. What is slow to you, as I am not familiar with the BMW navigation systems?

POST 3Original post

when driving, and especially on roundabouts, it gives the direction when I'm virtually on the turn as opposed to a short while before. I suppose I could get used to it, but the BMW one is a bit quicker in offering the direction. Also the voice on the Porsche sounds very elctronic. The advantage is that I can choose a different gender. I use a female voice (default).

POST 4Original post

To me the PCM 2.1 Nav in my CS seems to be a tad faster than my pioneer AVIC D2 in another car. They are both DVD based systems, but the PCM 2,1 have better mapping, track a bit more accurate & obviously with a bigger screen. Very happy with it.

POST 5Original post

I have an E46 M3 with nav, so its a bit of the older kind and I have tried quite a bit of the CS and 911 PCM nav. The porsche one was definitely faster, map zooming in and out, interactivity, route calculation seems a bit faster as well. To me the PCM seem more responsive. Definitely will get it when its my turn for that CS.. can't wait...

POST 6Original post

Glad that people wth PCM 2.1 feel the same way, as that is not the norm with other members. Programming the PCM is a bit of a pain, & the absent of Bluetooth & Voice Rec is disappointing. But the look & feel of the PCM 2.1 is second to none compare to any other car maker. :cheers:

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.