3 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHEasy DIY: Tightening up shifter play
Leading reported evidence
Use those
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I had some short (10mm or 3/8� or so) M5 socket heads so I used those.
Leading evidence: 'Use those' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use those' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T052503Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I just made an intro detailing all the work I�m doing to my 193k mile car, but while playing around with shift alignment I realised a good deal of the play (most front to back play anyhow) is in the bushings at the tower. I have Function First parts on my future list but I�m not there yet.
Shimming the bushing seemed possible but fiddly, and there are too many features on the tower to preload the bushings axially.
I chose to hold the front bushing tight by drilling and tapping through the tower into the bushing to restrain it axially. I had some short (10mm or 3/8� or so) M5 socket heads so I used those. M6 / 1/4� would be too big in my mind. This seem to work well, the tower took the threads ok. I didn�t have a fastener/rod I could send through, so I did one on each side and it seems pretty solid. That front/back bushing slop is gone, we will see how it holds up. If it goes sideways I�ll be in for FF parts anyhow. The holes in the tower are too small to cause trouble.
If you have shift tower access this is a 5 minute / $1 mod.
Thoughts?
Ingenious!
My first though was "How did you make a tapped hole while the bushing was still in place?"
Because I KNOW you can't get them out in one piece...
I am guessing a shallow divot into the bushing is OK?
My plan was to drill through the tower into the bushing to pin the bushing in place in the tower, since the bushings are intended to be static and not rotate.
For sure, the risk is affecting shifter movement as well. I was looking at shifter install guides and judging from those it looked like the shifter block didn�t protrude past the plane of the shift tower very much. Since the result of failure here is replacing all these parts (except the tower, unless I went Numeric/997), I was ok with drilling into the bushings to see.
With the drill or tap, there was a little bit of impingement on the shifter when they crossed the center line, so I went with short fasteners. With more care/knowledge on location, a thinner fastener (roll pin or bolt/nut) could go straight through. The tap or drill bit didn�t stop the shifter either, I just saw them wiggling moving the shifter around. I didn�t want my new bolts in there making plastic shavings so went short and diametrically opposed.
I pinned the forward bushing only as some rear play seems warranted for easier/smoother gear selection - I could feel this was the case just pushing the bushings one way or the other playing with the shifter. People sometimes complain about notchiness with the nice shifter kits, and after playing with this I think over constraining them might be the case. It feels pretty good taking the �loose� slop out as is.
I�ll probably still go Function First eventually, and get a shorter shift as well, but atleast now it feel �stock� instead of �worn out�. .
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.