15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 Turbo insurance
Leading reported evidence
Test method is
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
My tried and tested method is to use the comparison websites for indicative quotes then go direct to that provider and they can usually knock a little off that.
Leading evidence: 'Test method is' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test method is' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
My tried and tested method is to use the comparison websites for indicative quotes then go direct to that provider and they can usually knock a little off that.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I think they are year one, but come renewal without any claims or incidents mine went up from £500 to over £!k, rang them and said they couldn't better the renewal quote so went elsewhere using method described in earlier post
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Test method is
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
My tried and tested method is to use the comparison websites for indicative quotes then go direct to that provider and they can usually knock a little off that.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
My tried and tested method is to use the comparison websites for indicative quotes then go direct to that provider and they can usually knock a little off that.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I think they are year one, but come renewal without any claims or incidents mine went up from £500 to over £!k, rang them and said they couldn't better the renewal quote so went elsewhere using method described in earlier post
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T163944Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Depends on so many things doesn't it - but that's what brokers are for.
Try all those advertising in the Porsche Post - Adrian Flux, Footman James etc.
i've found those advertising in PP to be more expensive than most. My tried and tested method is to use the comparison websites for indicative quotes then go direct to that provider and they can usually knock a little off that.
There are too many variables to say who will be cheapest for an individual. However, cheapest is not necessarily the best solution where insurance is concerned! I have always found Porsche Insurance Services(Marsh) to be very competitive with good cover (i.e you don't have to go to some back street bodyshop for repairs!)
Two threads to look through (although not necessarily right up to date)
http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/tm.asp?m=275221&mpage=5&key=
http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/tm.asp?m=584141
Not quite 'turbo'....
But ClassicLine have met my requirements for the past 2 years including a very 'positive' agreed valuation done through PCGB
hth
Paul
Turbos are usually cheaper to insure than a Carrera, Paul.
There are so many variables, that there never seems to be a 'cheapest place'. That's why I started the Ultimate Insurance Thread, and if you flick through it, you can see the variation. I always find I have to shop around, every time I get a significant premium hike, and 9 times out of 10 I can find it cheaper.
I think we are also overdue for a "what oil?" or "what tyres?" thread now! [
] [
]
I have found that "CompareTheMarket.com" is the best comparison website by far AND you get a free Meerkat to boot. My wife's 2003 Boxster just re-insured for £350 and my 996 C2 was about the same last year. This is for both of us to drive fully comp. We now have 3 Meerkats with another on the way. Simples !
John
I have always found Adrian Flux to ne well priced and also great service wise. They also insure my old Volvo!
Full no claims limited mileage and my wife on it comes to just under £650.
Not that she would want to drive her mind you [8|]
I think they are year one, but come renewal without any claims or incidents mine went up from £500 to over £!k, rang them and said they couldn't better the renewal quote so went elsewhere using method described in earlier post
I once had all my cars with Adrian flux they screwed up big time.
They Could not deal with multiple policies they constantly confused things and made a complete mess of my NC.
I would be very careful with Adrian Flux.
just had to renew my insuarance on the bike,i was quoted £345 from the company i am with now ,last year i had a quote with gocompare.com ,they sent me a reminder that my insuarance was due, and did i want a quote for this year,just had the quote and it came to £165 ,so it does pay to shop around.
I agree, I'm only over here just 18 months or so, having imported my car form Ireland last year. I got a better deal on the insurance this year, Yes found the Porsche Post adverts much more expensive and tried comparethemarket.com and went with Admiral in the end as they offered me the best deal overall.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
