fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

Shopping list...

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHShopping list...

Leading reported evidence

Test ball joints

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

You might as well do the tuning fork arms if they've not been done to your knowledge; from bitter experience if they are worn they might rattle a bit though its not apparent to a visual inspection, or even testing the ball joints for play in situ.

Original post Read captured discussion
Shopping list...
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Test ball joints' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test ball joints' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 13 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Test ball joints

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

You might as well do the tuning fork arms if they've not been done to your knowledge; from bitter experience if they are worn they might rattle a bit though its not apparent to a visual inspection, or even testing the ball joints for play in situ.

Original post Read captured discussion
Shopping list...
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T205155Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi all Following a major service on my 996T, an inspection report threw up the following items that needed attention: Left and right rear top arms Left and right rear lower arms Front right lower arms High pressure aircon pipes Low pressure aircon pipes Brakes discs and pads could do with replacing as well Where's the best place(s) to get hold of these items?

POST 2Original post

Autodoc.co.uk for most but keep an eye on their prices as they constantly discount during the week. Aircon pipes will be your local Porsche centre.

POST 3Original post

I'd second Autodoc. I got all my suspension items from them for a complete overhaul. As Alex said watch for discounts.

POST 5Original post

This looks like a good pack for OE spec suspension bits, though you'd still need the rear upper arms. You might as well do the tuning fork arms if they've not been done to your knowledge; from bitter experience if they are worn they might rattle a bit though its not apparent to a visual inspection, or even testing the ball joints for play in situ. They are very easy to replace. https://www.spyderperformance.co.uk...ontrol-support-arm-99634105318-99634104306-3/

POST 6Original post

Good luck with the aircon pipes, non in the country last month Hartech had to wait for one coming over from germany

POST 7 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks Robertb I'll get these ordered - might as well refresh the lot Can you suggest the rear upper arms I need? Don't know which brand/type (with or without rubber mounting??) etc

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Reading Porsche are having probs sourcing them too.... will get the other stuff done in the meantime - thanks

POST 10 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

https://www.autodoc.co.uk/meyle/8051122 or https://www.autodoc.co.uk/meyle/9716422 :dont know:

POST 11Original post

I got my rear upper arms from Carparts4less in their frequent 20% off sales... they are Meyle. I can fish out the invoice if you want?

POST 12 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

That would be great- thanks again @Robertb

POST 13Original post

Sorry they weren't Meyle, they were CTE. Have been absolutely fine, quality looked great. https://www.carparts4less.co.uk/search/624330032

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.