fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

Advice on purchase - DME guru needed

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
3 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHAdvice on purchase - DME guru needed

Leading reported evidence

Reset back

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

There is no reset back to 0 again, unless some special steps are taken or some other event occurs (like a CEL comes on).

Advice on purchase - DME guru needed
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Reset back' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Reset back' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 3 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Run time

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Or someone attempted to 'hack' the DME and remove some hours of run time.

Advice on purchase - DME guru needed

Use unsigned number

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

AFAIK all counters like that use an unsigned number that ranges from 0 to 65535.

Advice on purchase - DME guru needed
Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Reset back

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

There is no reset back to 0 again, unless some special steps are taken or some other event occurs (like a CEL comes on).

Advice on purchase - DME guru needed

Run time

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Or someone attempted to 'hack' the DME and remove some hours of run time.

Advice on purchase - DME guru needed

Use unsigned number

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

AFAIK all counters like that use an unsigned number that ranges from 0 to 65535.

Advice on purchase - DME guru needed
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T100758Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

My brother is looking to buy a 2005 911 S, Launch Edition and there seems to be what might be "funky" information from the DME. The car is modified but I don't have the modification list with me. Range 1 = 12274, 6318.5 h Range 2 = 886, 6318.4 h Range 3 = 112, 6314.8 h Range 4 = 24, 394.1 h Range 5 = 1, 167.8 h Range 6 = 1, 167.8 h Operating hours counter -2775.900 ( yes, that is a "-" in front of the hours ) Total distance 36336.000 odometer reads 23259 miles The main questions are: 1. Is this car safe to purchase, based on this information? 2. What's up with the numbers and are they normal? Thanks.

POST 2Original post

Based on just the info you posted I'd say the car is *not* safe to buy. The numbers show the engine mostly experienced an overrev due to a missed upshift, that is instead of shifting from 3rd to 4th the driver grabbed 2nd. Not good. If the dash in front of the number is correct, that is if it is *not* an artifact of the tool that was used to pull the numbers from the DME -- and I can't fathom the reason why it should be correct (but let me think on this while I type the rest of my response), this suggests the DME has been tampered with. Possibly a 'flash' or a 'tune' has been applied. Or someone attempted to 'hack' the DME and remove some hours of run time. This suggests then the odometer might have been tampered with as well. With all those overrevs this suggests the car was tracked (and badly?) and I would avoid the car like the plague. Still can't see how that number can be a negative. AFAIK all counters like that use an unsigned number that ranges from 0 to 65535. In some cases the DME counter will reach 65535 and stick there. There is no reset back to 0 again, unless some special steps are taken or some other event occurs (like a CEL comes on). Advise your brother to walk away from this car. There's always another car. Sincerely, Rockster.

POST 3Original post

Thank you very much for your insight. Not only are the overrevs concerning, but the resale value down the road might be affected as well. Most P-car owners like their cars to be pristine.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.