12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHExhaust Clamping Sleeve - 99611122002
Leading reported evidence
Replace those
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I replaced those with stainless parts from bel metric.
Leading evidence: 'Replace those' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace those' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I�d like to get mine replaced with high quality stainless ones as well.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I don't know of any stainless ones, but I used these:
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T220748Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
My 996 does not have clamping sleeves like that. But my Cayenne does, and they are stainless steel. However the carriage bolts and nuts are plain steel. I replaced those with stainless parts from bel metric.
I don't know of any stainless ones, but I used these:
https://www.rmeuropean.com/Make/Part...ch=99611122002
Amazon has URO ones for $13.90:
Amazon
Amazon
At that price I figure once they get real rusty it's worth to cut off and put on new ones.
The original Porsche exhaust clamps are not made of stainless steel. Please do not use the ones from Summit Racing. That is cheapest China quality. You can recognize it by the fact that the clamp consists of only one layer of sheet metal.
Make sure that the clamp has 2 layers of sheet metal and that they slide into each other. The outer clamps are made of galvanized steel. There is nothing made of stainless steel that has sufficient strength.
https://www.ebay.de/itm/193719502842...3ABFBMjr_B-8Zl
My current clamps are from HJS in Germany. You need the 55mm version.
thank you for the feedback & link. My tech buddy said that he�d quit talking to me if I bought the Summit clamps.
Now I need to search for HJS in the USA
Timely post. I had some work done on my car and the replacement clamp is full-on rusted by now. It looks terrible and is visible from behind the car. I�d like to get mine replaced with high quality stainless ones as well.
