17 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCayman base versus S
Reported or suspected cause
perfect choice
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
But I can’t use 320 without going to jail so I find my car right where I want it to be it was the perfect choice for me.
Leading evidence: 'perfect choice' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'perfect choice' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Use 320 without going' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
But I can’t use 320 without going to jail so I find my car right where I want it to be it was the perfect choice for me.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T031046Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Lots of base versions came with 18" wheels so that is not inconsistent... the only inconsistency is the S on the trunk, and I'd guess a previous owner added that thinking it would make the car cooler. Probably didn't even shift the "
Cayman
" letters over to make it all centred.
The proof is right there in the VIN. If it indicates Base, it’s a Base. Cheapest trim level upgrade I’ve heard of. Find or buy an ‘S’ trunk badge from eBay or a junkyard and ‘VOILA’, you’re driving a
Cayman S
.
Comon you understand. Any kid with cards in his Schwinn spokes certainly understands. In defense of the previous owner, that certainly is the cheapest way to get an S.
I’ll say this, I feel like my
Spyder
is right in the sweet spot. Newer Spyders have incredible engines transplanted from the
911
series. But I can’t use 320 without going to jail so I find my car right where I want it to be it was the perfect choice for me.
Thanks for the comments. Seller did not have a rear photo. I was disappointed when I saw the S but as you say the VIN does not lie. When I look closely the chromed S is a little different. Cheers
Funny thing - I won 2nd place in the
Boxster/Cayman
section of a local Concours.. and it was announced that it was for a 2009 Boxter S - which I don't have. And I have no S on the trunk lid or anywhere else on the car. What I do have is dual exhaust tips off an S - which I put on just because I thought they looked better.
I went the other direction with my 2.9L
Cayman
. I debadged it, carefully removing '
Cayman
' from the hatch lid. Since I have a Fabspeed exhaust, the only clue that it's "base" is the black/charcoal brake calipers. The other difference being the spoiler lip color. Both these clues are things which only the educated would look for. But my goal wasn't to fool anyone into thinking it was an 'S'.
I like the stealth look. F
unny how many times people have asked what it is. Only the Porsche shield on the hood and wheel caps (the stenciled "Porsche" on the rear hatch glass is fairly inconspicuous) tell of its bloodline. And at first glance several people mistook the stallion in the logo as a Ferrari badge.
It's also funny that, before the Panameras and SUVs came along, many Americans thought a modern Porsche was a 911. They had no idea what a 987 was, but assume since 987 is greater than 911, it must be better. I don't dissuade them.
That’s not the same, I had a Dansk sausage on my
986
, very cool dual tips and a growl. Your choice is not a foul Don, it’s not putting RS on the tail. I loved the look and sound so I get your position Don. I have to say sport exhaust is much better in my opinion. I love growl and no growl on a long highway trip. Worse IMO? The Fiero Ferrari crowd, ummmmm no, be what you are, a Pontiac.
Honestly it’s your car, mod however you like. But I see that the
Porsche
community gets a little touchy on mods, on example is caliper colors. My base calipers were gray so I painted them yellow and too many people were asking if they were pccbs. Obviously base brakes look nothing like pccbs. So now they are a sweet burgundy. But a poser badge is the biggest offense. Saw this in the subie community with WRX and STI.
It’s not some infraction worthy of excoriation. People always have some opinion. My 944 wasn’t a real
Porsche
and my flat six
Spyder
is a hairdresser’s car. But at least everybody doesn’t take me even old Ford woodies in my no go showboat. ( that’s how long this has been going on). 😂 I do have to draw the line though at hello Kitty Lamborghinis.
In Maryland we have every 2 years emissions testing. But is is strictly via the OBD port. Basically, if there is no check engine light you pass. I've taken my 20 year old minivan with a small exhaust leak through with no problem since there was no check engine light. They even have a self service kiosk which takes $4 off the $14 fee.
In terms of car mods, everyone has their own taste. But not cool to misrepresent the car. I chuckle when I see a regular Benz which has a slapped on AMG badge.