6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAir Con
Leading reported evidence
Use re-gas
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I don't think there is an issue with "qualification" as the leak detection is done completely automatically by the equipment used for the re-gas.
Leading evidence: 'Use re-gas' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check leaks' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would think they should be able to check for leaks.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T072535Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi,
Like millions of other people right now I am noticing my air con is well substandard for these ambient conditions.
It was topped up a couple of years ago and has gradually detoriated which is not unusual.
Before I start booking it in can anyone enlighten me as to how the recent changes in gas types effect the aircon and, on a 1998 model, will I need to carry out any conversions?
Also, any suggestions on places to go in East London / West Essex area? I dont know the cost, but would you rule out Kwik Fit for a simple air con top up if required?
Thanks in advance,
Rob
I definitely wouldn't rule out Kwik-Fit. I've heard of quite a few people who have taken 996s to them. As long as they know the correct weight of refrigerant and oil to add, then it shouldn't be a problem. The system uses 900g of R134a and 195cc of oil. They should evacuate the system first, and then refill with the correct quantity.
Hi Richard, Thanks for that rather specific and informative information. I will try them and see what they say. Do you think they are qualified to detect any potential leaks in the system? Thanks, Rob
I don't think there is an issue with "qualification" as the leak detection is done completely automatically by the equipment used for the re-gas. It takes over an hour for the machine to evacuate the system and recover whatever gas is left in there, the system is then pressure tested with nitrogen and any loss of pressure indicates a leak. If a leak is detected at this stage the machine will not refill with refrigerant and, incidentally, Kwik Fit will not charge you either!! The system will be refilled only if it's determined leak-free. Richard, are you sure about the 195cc of oil?? The figures I have for my 964 - admittedly a different animal - are 660g of R134a but only 19ml of PAG46 oil. Regards Dave
