12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCarrera 4S - Buying Guide / Advice etc
Leading reported evidence
Check over and don't forget
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Buy something with good service history (it is amazing how many don't have it), and get it checked over and don't forget to by the cab version
Leading evidence: 'Check over and don't forget' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check inner face' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Rodney - Good question, I suppose it comes down to running costs, I'm going to be using it as an every day car, It will cover 10k per annum and don't fancy the increased cost of the Turbo.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Want to buy my first Porsche and my eyes are firmly set on a C4S.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Rodney - Good question, I suppose it comes down to running costs, I'm going to be using it as an every day car, It will cover 10k per annum and don't fancy the increased cost of the Turbo.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T154520Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi,
New to the forum but been having a read some previous posts and seems like you guys have some good knowledge that I'd love to tap into. Want to buy my first Porsche and my eyes are firmly set on a C4S. Is there a good buying guide that I can get hold of anywhere?
I'm looking to spend upto £30k on a 2004ish model but really lack in any expertise when it comes to Porsche. My last 3 cars have all been BMWs, 2001 AC Schnitzer 3 Series Saloon, 2003 325i M-Tec Coupe, 2008 320d M-Tec Coupe. What do I need to look out for, what are the common faults, what are the warning signs etc etc.
Any help would be appreciated - Thanks.
Hi, when I bought mine I had it inspected by Peter Morgan, he is extremely well regarded and will give you an extremely extensive report indicating any problems. I would use him when you think you have found the one you like.
www.porscheinspections.com
Rodney - Good question, I suppose it comes down to running costs, I'm going to be using it as an every day car, It will cover 10k per annum and don't fancy the increased cost of the Turbo. Although having never owned either the Turbo or the C4S my reasoning maybe wrong - what do you think?
Best Advice is get the car you intend buying checked.
But Rear Main oil seal is common had 2 replaced in 15k under warranty
Disc rusting check inner face
Front rads and air con rads make sure free from leaves.
Fuel gauge on 996 C4S does not allways register unless you put in a fair amount of fuel in.
Check for inner tyre wear.
These things are from my own personal experience, apart from that great car.
Good Luck with search.
Cliff.
The running gear is the same as the turbos, but turbo servicing is slightly more expensive, I think depreciation will be less on the turbo.
The turbo is in a different league to the C4s - it is insanely fast and can easily be made to go faster and has a super reliable engine. IMO a no brainer.
Aside from the inspection, make sure you are very familiar with the extras available for the year/model v extras on the actual car you are interested in.
M030 suspension is another I'd look out for but probably best to drive cars with and without to see what suits you best. 030 can bit a little harsh for some people.
Watch out for stone chips on front bumper and bonnet. Quite common but may be worth bargaining into deal before purchase.
Peter Morgan also has some buyer guide books which is useful when you start looking but not a replacement for a full professional inspection.
Great cars by the way [
]
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
