13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSeperate trackday insurance
Reported or suspected cause
cost of mounting a case would be similar
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
I suspect the cost of mounting a case would be similar to paying for the repairs, but with no guarantee of winning!
Leading evidence: 'cost of mounting a case would be similar' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'cost of mounting a case would be similar' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Run off so i don't insure there' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Some tracks I know well and have lots of run-off so I don't insure there.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T113718Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hello All,
Who here on the 996 forum tracks their car and does not have trackday insurance on their premium but pays seperately for cover on the track.
My question to those who have done this is - with who and how much have you paid in the past?
Cheers if you take the time to reply
RB
I get 5 per year (not enough!) with my NU road policy. They should cost £105 per day, but due to a fortunate mistake during the quoting process, I get them for £50 this year. Some tracks I know well and have lots of run-off so I don't insure there. Also airfield tracks I don't bother insuring for. 10% excess is typical for this kind of arrangement.
The alternative is to use
MORIS
(I have to use them for foreign tracks) but they're £160/day and the terms are far less favourable (max of £50/hr on repairs). Better than nothing though.
I recently faced a similar problem with my first ever trackday at the beginning of June.I could not get supplementary insurance for less than £90 per event. I ended up cancelling my existing insurance early, and going with ClassicLine (contact details in PP). They gave me full cover on limited mileage -7,500pa; four track days per year; 90 day European cover and UK and European breakdown cover for under £400 - Oh, and lower excesses than my previous insurer
Hope that's of some help
Jon
i did my first ever track evening at bedford a month or so ago, and paid £125 (0.5% of the value of the car) with a £2.5k excess with MORIS i believe, because it was my first time.
however, not going to bother for the next one at bedford as you would have to be doing something moumentally stupid to actually manage to hit anything and insurance doesn't cover the drivetrain anyway which is the most likely thing to go bang
not sure, only if you're going to drive like a maniac like the aston driver was. but then you shouldn't be allowed on the track anyway and the guy is having his GT3 paid for by the aston driver AIUI, so even if the GT3 driver had been insured, it would have made any difference as the crash wasn't his fault anyway. just bl**dy bad luck for him
excellent point, well made. i guess it all boils down to how much risk a person is willing to take. helluva argument to just buy something cheap and thrash it round the3 track though
Its also amazing how many people at the scene of an accident say they'll pay....... and then the next day say it was all your fault!
I wonder what the bottom line is with this..... Anyone a lawyer? I suspect the cost of mounting a case would be similar to paying for the repairs, but with no guarantee of winning! [
]
Doesn't specialist track-day insurance cover you if someone hits you ? Suely that's the greatest risk, because you can be careful, but you can't control the other driver' actions.
I have Track Day cover included in my policy with RSA through AON but it excludes car to car contact. I seem to remember that some time ago I was looking into Track Day insurance and all the quotes also excluded this. They also exclude the 'Ring which is a pain.
If you still want to do track days, don't want to cough up on insurance and don't mind a different car then sign up to BookaTracks emails and wait for the Caterham offers coming in. All inclusive of car, fuel, track day entry and you don't have to worry about wearing tyres out just how much excess you are prepared to pay in the event of an off damaging the car. I usually share the day with a friend and then make sure its open pit , so you can swap over, wait for the brakes to cool and go straight back out. Brilliant. I think it cost me about £450 for the day last time at Donno, so £225 each. I don't think that was a bad deal
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.