9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNew service book...
Leading reported evidence
Fill original
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Once you fill your original that is the only proper option.
Leading evidence: 'Fill original' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Fill original' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
The 96t has run out of service stamp space now (FPSH for 19 years), so, I have ordered a new service book from Porsche.. £55....
£55 for a service book
And just to rub salt into the wallet, the parts guy said "wow.. these used to be £12".
Also available on eBay and surprisingly cheaper (but not much cheaper)
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/402756267333
I suppose that's Porsche tax for you
Winny
It's a little late mentioning this now, I've ordered a new service book though Porsche centre Stockport at a cost of £14.30. The sales guy did say that 'I could be wait a while'. Another 996 owner has been waiting 6 months for his to arrive.
I posted a reply to the same question on here a couple of months ago.
I ordered a new book from Porsche Silverstone and it was £12.00. I had to wait a few days for them to order it.
No reason why it wouldn't be the same price now.
I had waited over 9 months for a replacement service book from my OPC, several calls during that time and still no books being printed, just as my service was due I came across the eBay link above so purchased one.
It's sold as a 'reproduction' but I found it very difficult to tell the difference between it and an original.
They are not fake, they all say that when they are not the original with the car, it is done to stop people faking them.
Once you fill your original that is the only proper option.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
