7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWater based paint vs conventional paint
Leading reported evidence
Use 3 years ago
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
My car was repainted 3 years ago with solvent-based paint and some recent work done a month ago had to be done with water-based as the bodyshop were not allowed to buy the solvent-based paint that was used 3 years ago.
Leading evidence: 'Use 3 years ago' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check next time' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'll make a mental note to double check next time!!!
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
So my question is, were oil based paints still allowed on a UK car at the time of the 996, or can I safely assume that all UK cars in metallic black would have used the water based version 744?
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
My car was repainted 3 years ago with solvent-based paint and some recent work done a month ago had to be done with water-based as the bodyshop were not allowed to buy the solvent-based paint that was used 3 years ago.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
So my question is, were oil based paints still allowed on a UK car at the time of the 996, or can I safely assume that all UK cars in metallic black would have used the water based version 744?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T035758Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi
I unfortunately need a new front bumper. I have managed to track one down which I am assured is in perfect condition and in black. However the breaker is telling me it may not match as Porsche did multiple versions of black. I have taken a look at the paint code list on renntech (http://www.renntech.org/forums/index.php?autocom=content&code=colors_carrera), and it seems there were only two metallic blacks on pre-facelift Carrera's, being 744 and 746. Mine is 744. It says that 744 is water based, while 746 is "conventional paint" which I assume means oil based paint.
So my question is, were oil based paints still allowed on a UK car at the time of the 996, or can I safely assume that all UK cars in metallic black would have used the water based version 744?
Cheers
Greg
I can't say for sure, but would have thought that all UK cars would have been painted in the same way at that time. I would also have thought that one painted with a 2-pack paint would match a water-based paint. When I had my PU re-painted on my C2 it was done with a conventional 2-pack, and it matched fine. It is also highly likely that it has been repainted in that time, and who knows what with. There was a solid black - you don't think the breaker meant that, do you?
And for PCGB members, that information is also available at: http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/tm.asp?m=230691 [
] [
]
Hi Richard,
He only said "multiple versions of black", so I have gone back to him already asking him to confirm that the bumper is metallic black (which is what I asked for). Waiting for a response.
I am thinking the same as you, that they are all likely to have been done in the same version of metallic black, but I guess you never know.
Thanks
Greg
Greg,
The issue of water-based or solvent-based paint is one of health and safety at the point of application - it's got nothing to do with the final destination of the car. In this country the law has become very intransigent over recent years such that solvent-based paints are virtually impossible to get unless you can claim required originality of a classic vehicle.
My car was repainted 3 years ago with solvent-based paint and some recent work done a month ago had to be done with water-based as the bodyshop were not allowed to buy the solvent-based paint that was used 3 years ago.
There are many different blacks used by Porsche, both solid and metallic, and without the paint code you have no chance of ensuring a match. L744 and L746 are both Black Metallic - and neither are water-based.
Regards
Dave
Not disputing what you say in general, but for Greg's model, there was only one metallic black, and L744 is quoted as water based in the workshop manual for the 996. Unless it was a special order, of course. Basalt was introduced for the facelift in 2002.
Yes, Richard, I apologise. I checked my source and although 744 was solvent-based in the early 90's it changed to water-based for the 996 series. I'll make a mental note to double check next time!!!
Regards
Dave
It's the introduction of these new-fangled water-cooled things where it all went wrong. [
] At least I've got a 964 crankcase casting in mine to remind me of those days! [
]
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.